We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Military Tolerance Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Radical Conservative Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2138
Description[?]:
This bill is to prohibit open homosexuality. The RCP feels this is necessary because it is based upon the same principle that men and women should not be together in both peacetime and wartime. This is so that the military can focus solely on it's duties without distractions. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Military stance on homosexuality.
Old value:: Homosexuality is allowed in the military.
Current: Homosexuality is allowed in the military.
Proposed: Open homosexuality is not tolerated in the military. The military has a "don't ask, don't tell" policy.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 04:43:32, November 08, 2005 CET | From | Liberty Party | To | Debating the Military Tolerance Act |
Message | First the racists said that white and blacks couldn't serve together as it would disrupt unit cohesion. Now people of all races serve together and this has been shown to be a racist myth. Then the misogynists said that men and women couldn't serve together as it would disrupt unit cohesion. Now people of both sexes serve together and this has been shown to be a sexist myth. Now the homophobes try to prevent homosexuals serving, claiming that it would disrupt unit cohesion. The reality is that in the many countries where people of sexual persuasions serve together, there is no such disruption and this has been shown to be a myth perpetuated by those who hate homosexuals. |
Date | 04:54:32, November 08, 2005 CET | From | Partiya Natsional'noy Gordyy | To | Debating the Military Tolerance Act |
Message | We oppose. |
Date | 22:49:36, November 08, 2005 CET | From | Radical Conservative Party | To | Debating the Military Tolerance Act |
Message | You calling me prejudice? |
Date | 01:36:29, November 09, 2005 CET | From | Liberty Party | To | Debating the Military Tolerance Act |
Message | Yes |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 259 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 296 | |||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: All role-play must respect the established cultural background in Culturally Protected nations. |
Random quote: "It is obvious that the laissez-faire ideology represents the interests of big business. For decades, the right-wing has opposed welfare programs and nationalised companies, in favour of big business disguised under 'economic liberty'." - Cecilia Xu, former Gaduri politician |