We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Pornography Regulation Bill of 2950
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hutorian Conservative Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2951
Description[?]:
| .......... |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy with respect to the production of pornography.
Old value:: The production of pornography is treated as any other business.
Current: The production of pornography is legal, but regulated.
Proposed: The production of pornography is legal, but regulated.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 09:48:02, June 09, 2010 CET | From |  Conservative-Libertarian Party (UM) | To | Debating the Pornography Regulation Bill of 2950 |
| Message | Madam Speaker, what sort of regulation exactly does the NSC intend to have introduced? |
| Date | 14:46:59, June 09, 2010 CET | From | Conservative-Libertarian Party (UM) | To | Debating the Pornography Regulation Bill of 2950 |
| Message | Madam Speaker, we await the reply of the NSC spokesman. It is a perfectly reasonable question. How does the party opposite envisage that pornography will be regulated? |
| Date | 14:55:23, June 09, 2010 CET | From | Hutorian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Pornography Regulation Bill of 2950 |
| Message | Madam Speaker, its no longer important, given the Bill wont pass. |
| Date | 14:56:56, June 09, 2010 CET | From | Conservative-Libertarian Party (UM) | To | Debating the Pornography Regulation Bill of 2950 |
| Message | Madam Speaker, what a brilliant way of attempting to explain a policy to the country. I interpret that as meaning, Madam Speaker, that they haven't got a clue. |
| Date | 15:01:57, June 09, 2010 CET | From | Hutorian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Pornography Regulation Bill of 2950 |
| Message | They would Madam Speaker, just shows that whilst they accuse us of having no respect in Parliament - they are no different. So we expect them to stop being such hypocrites in the future. |
| Date | 16:32:17, June 09, 2010 CET | From | Conservative-Libertarian Party (UM) | To | Debating the Pornography Regulation Bill of 2950 |
| Message | Madam Speaker, perhaps the gentleman could tell us what we are being hypocritical about? We are asking him what this policy really means and how he would have it implemented and he will not, or cannot, tell us. Why doesn't he take the opportunity to tell the voters of this country what he would do regards pornography if his party were elected with a majority? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 150 | ||
| no |
Total Seats: 241 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: http://www.fantasynamegenerators.com and http://www.behindthename.com/random are great resources for coming up with character names from unfamiliar cultures. |
| Random quote: "Erotic politicians, that's what we are. We're interested in anything about revolt, disorder, chaos and activity that appears to have no meaning." Jim Morrison |