We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Internet Sevice Provider Partial Nationalisation Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hutorian Conservative Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2952
Description[?]:
........... |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on internet service providers (ISPs).
Old value:: Private companies provide internet service throughout the nation, without government interference.
Current: Private companies provide internet service throughout the nation, without government interference.
Proposed: There is a national state-owned internet service provider, but small private ISPs are allowed, which are heavily restricted to ensure that they stay small.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 13:59:13, June 09, 2010 CET | From | Hutorian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Internet Sevice Provider Partial Nationalisation Act |
Message | Rt Hon Baron Mancini MP, NSC Leader, Madam Speaker, we would like to hear an explanation from the Prime Minister on this Bill. He was a member of Parliament for Labour who oversaw the radical nationalisation of nearly all aspects of Hutorian Business during the NSC regime. He opposed a fully nationalised state ISP on these grounds and i quote, "we cannot control the minds of our people". Yet the internet content is not regulated, this Bill just regards the companies which provide the internet. Their No vote was based on lies and we would like to hear their reasoning for either supporting or rejecting this Act and why the opposed the previous Bill? (http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=292685) |
Date | 20:51:51, June 09, 2010 CET | From | Hutorian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Internet Sevice Provider Partial Nationalisation Act |
Message | Rt Hon Baron Mancini MP, NSC Leader, Madam Speaker, yet another question to the PM goes unanswered. Cannot say we are surprised by this clearly inept Labour Leader who has no respect for the Parliamentary system. The NSC want the PM to answer the question put to him in our previous statement. |
Date | 11:49:06, June 10, 2010 CET | From | United Forces of Decay | To | Debating the Internet Sevice Provider Partial Nationalisation Act |
Message | We will certainly support that. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes | Total Seats: 226 | ||
no | Total Seats: 165 | ||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
Random quote: "Fascism is a religion. The twentieth century will be known in history as the century of fascism." - Benito Mussolini |