We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Membership of the Community of International States.
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal Party for Equality
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2046
Description[?]:
Proposing that we, as a nation, join the CSI. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 23:53:24, May 01, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Party for Equality | To | Debating the Membership of the Community of International States. |
Message | I have read the treaty, and it sounds reasonable and fair. Being as my party at present holds the position for the minister for foreign affairs, it would be I who was the mediator fro all matters except defense, which would be mediated by the NCP, according to their rules. However, before we voted on anything in the community council we would have to get a bill passed here about it. |
Date | 02:11:17, May 02, 2005 CET | From | National Centrist Party | To | Debating the Membership of the Community of International States. |
Message | We're reluctant, but would agree with one caveat - that we're never in charge of dealing with them directly. |
Date | 07:21:54, May 02, 2005 CET | From | Right Wing Liberals Party | To | Debating the Membership of the Community of International States. |
Message | Surely if it affects us Internally i would have a say? I thought a vote would be fair. Im for joining right now. |
Date | 09:37:10, May 02, 2005 CET | From | People's Party | To | Debating the Membership of the Community of International States. |
Message | I don't like entangling alliances, nevertheless if they are for free trade, I don't mind signing. |
Date | 11:05:03, May 02, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Party for Equality | To | Debating the Membership of the Community of International States. |
Message | PP: Yeah, they are for free trade, and we can withdraw whenever we want. RWL: everybody has a say on any matter which is gonna affect us internally - we have to put them to the vote |
Date | 11:29:40, May 02, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Party for Equality | To | Debating the Membership of the Community of International States. |
Message | I realise we havent had much time to debate this, but if I don't put it to vote now it wont reach completion til the election, then it will be put back to debate, and altogether it will take ages. |
Date | 14:31:36, May 02, 2005 CET | From | Right Wing Liberals Party | To | Debating the Membership of the Community of International States. |
Message | No free trade i must protect Harlesburg! |
Date | 23:33:07, May 02, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Party for Equality | To | Debating the Membership of the Community of International States. |
Message | Pity about the whole unanimous vote thing, means not much will get done, i suspect, and reminds me rather of the league of nations. nevertheless, it is probably good as I can't see many of you wanting to give up any sovereignty |
Date | 03:25:59, May 03, 2005 CET | From | National Centrist Party | To | Debating the Membership of the Community of International States. |
Message | We're willing to make concessions on that count. It certainly is a shame about the unanimous vote requirement. |
Date | 12:46:17, May 03, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Party for Equality | To | Debating the Membership of the Community of International States. |
Message | well, several other members seem to have a problem with that, so maybe it will get changed. alright, we have a good majority, i wont wait til this goes through - We're joining. |
Date | 12:57:18, May 03, 2005 CET | From | Right Wing Liberals Party | To | Debating the Membership of the Community of International States. |
Message | But think of the poor squash farmers! =( |
Date | 15:36:50, May 03, 2005 CET | From | To | Debating the Membership of the Community of International States. |
Message | Wesupport membership provided it reamains unaimous voting. Likaton should always retain a veto. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 132 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 21 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 14 |
Random fact: If you have a question, post it on the forum. Game Moderators and other players will be happy to help you. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
Random quote: "I bet their mothers don't love them. Many Trigunian women are so cold. I mean it's a racist hellhole in parts." - Tirza Sommer, former Dorvish politician |