We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Immigration Act of 2953
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hutorian Conservative Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2954
Description[?]:
| ........... |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning immigration.
Old value:: Quotas are based on individual applicant's qualifications.
Current: Quotas are based on individual applicant's qualifications.
Proposed: No foreigners are permitted to reside permanently in this nation.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 12:54:17, June 14, 2010 CET | From | Hutorian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Immigration Act of 2953 |
| Message | Madam Speaker, we ask the UFD are they in favour of this proposal? |
| Date | 13:05:49, June 14, 2010 CET | From | Conservative-Libertarian Party (UM) | To | Debating the Immigration Act of 2953 |
| Message | Madam Speaker, we now have the definitive statement that the party opposite has gone full circle and once again gone back to being the HNP. The people of Hutori have been deceived. |
| Date | 13:42:35, June 14, 2010 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the Immigration Act of 2953 |
| Message | Madam Speaker, recently Baroness Marelle argued her party's case against racism, yet he we are, back to the good old HNP. We thank the honorable baroness for showing the people of hutori how they voted. |
| Date | 13:55:58, June 14, 2010 CET | From | Hutorian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Immigration Act of 2953 |
| Message | Madam Speaker, this Bill was proposed before elections, so it has the peoples support behind it. The people voted for this so the Labour and CLP members cannot claim the people were decieved. |
| Date | 14:12:47, June 14, 2010 CET | From | United Forces of Decay | To | Debating the Immigration Act of 2953 |
| Message | The UFD fear that this proposal is too radical. We don't see the need to ban so-called "foreigners" from living in this country. We would support the bill if you are willing to retreat from the Emancipation bill though. |
| Date | 14:19:19, June 14, 2010 CET | From | Hutorian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Immigration Act of 2953 |
| Message | Madam Speaker, because the CLP/Labour cannot change any laws, without either UFD or NSC approval then we see no reason why we shouldnt withdraw from the Emancipation Bill. It is in agreement then we will withdraw from the treaty for your support in this Act. |
| Date | 14:28:37, June 14, 2010 CET | From | Conservative-Libertarian Party (UM) | To | Debating the Immigration Act of 2953 |
| Message | Madam Speaker, the NSC claim this was introduced before the election. It was introduced marginally before the election date and as the gentleman knows, such issues do not factor in the decisions of the electorate, especially when they have not been put to vote. So the gentleman cannot claim that this has the support of the electorate. Madam Speaker, we need more specifics. Just how does the government intend to kick people out of the country? What about those 'foreigners' who now have Hutorian citizenship and nationality? Will they be kicked out. Madam Speaker, this is a disgusting bill based on pure racism. We are saddened to see the HNP return. The fundamental question is, Madam Speaker, did the HNP just change their views on race out of convenience, on a power drive, or did they just have a moment of madness? Madam Speaker, we have just seen how unprincipled this government is. |
| Date | 14:31:43, June 14, 2010 CET | From | Hutorian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Immigration Act of 2953 |
| Message | Rt Hon Baroness Marelle, Prime Minister, Madam Speaker, all people currently within the Hutorian borders are safe and will stay in Hutori. No-one shall be kicked out of the nation. The NSC's views are based on whatever needs to be done to benefit Hutori. We are not bound on a single ideology like most parties in Hutori - apart from our socialist economic policy. The NSC is a pragmatic party that will support any Bill, in the correct circumstances. |
| Date | 15:03:50, June 14, 2010 CET | From | Conservative-Libertarian Party (UM) | To | Debating the Immigration Act of 2953 |
| Message | Madam Speaker, if "the NSC's views are based on whatever needs to be done to benefit Hutori", could he please explain how this bill will benefit Hutori? |
| Date | 15:08:01, June 14, 2010 CET | From | Hutorian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Immigration Act of 2953 |
| Message | Rt Hon Baroness Marelle, Prime Minister, Madam Speaker, this Act will benefit Hutori, in that we can now look after our own citizens properly without having to cater for immigrants. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 252 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 139 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy is completely free! If you want to support the game financially, feel free to make a small donation to the lievenswouter@gmail.com Paypal account. |
| Random quote: "Stupid people are ruining America." - Herman Cain |