We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Foreign Embassies Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hutorian Conservative Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2954
Description[?]:
............ |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change
The government's policy regarding foreign embassies.
Old value:: Foreign countries may establish an embassy after obtaining approval from the Foreign Office.
Current: Foreign countries may establish an embassy after obtaining approval from the Foreign Office.
Proposed: The government does not allow foreign embassies.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 14:17:38, June 14, 2010 CET | From | Hutorian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Foreign Embassies Bill |
Message | Rt Hon Baroness Marelle, Prime Minister, Madam Speaker, may i first say, what a glorious day in Hutori that the people have given their backing to the NSC/UFD coalition. This has shown that the people have approved of the outlawing of religion and are fully behind our recent law-changes. Labours protest campaign has grinded to a halt and the CLP have been destroyed. The NSC got its highest share of the vote ever. Things could not get much better for the NSC/UFD. According to Labour, my reputation has been destroyed? This just shows my reputation is at an all time high! Having been the PM who banned religion and survived! Now, Madam Speaker, to this issue. Hutori doesnt want foreign diplomats corrupting our nation. This Bill sees foreign political pressure removed from Hutori and given the recent elections, this is the only form of opposition left to the NSC/UFD. The NSC/UFD now will introduce sweeping reforms to introduce a totalitarian state that has been the NSC's ultimate aim in Hutori. |
Date | 14:21:38, June 14, 2010 CET | From | United Forces of Decay | To | Debating the Foreign Embassies Bill |
Message | The UFD have decided to support the Hutori National-Socialist Congress in their isolationist policy, but their are certain steps we are not willing to take. It's one way to ban foreigners to live in this country and forbid embassies, but we won't actively oppress other nationalities already living in this country. A "foreigner" has just to be seen as someone who is citizen of another country, not someone who's a member of another nationality. Therefore ethnic minorities whose people are Hutorian citizens must not be oppressed. |
Date | 14:23:37, June 14, 2010 CET | From | Hutorian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Foreign Embassies Bill |
Message | Rt Hon Baroness Marelle, Prime Minister, Madam Speaker, we are in favour of protecting ALL CITIZENS in Hutori, including minorities. The UFD have an assurance from me personally that the NSC will not encroach on the rights of minorities in Hutori. |
Date | 14:24:28, June 14, 2010 CET | From | Conservative-Libertarian Party (UM) | To | Debating the Foreign Embassies Bill |
Message | Madam Speaker, which party was it that attacked the CLP for "relative isolationism", and said that isolationist policies were "stuck in the past"? (http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=293446) Madam Speaker, just what do the NSC stand for these days? Why do they not just go back to being the HNP and then we will all know exactly what they are for. |
Date | 14:26:18, June 14, 2010 CET | From | United Forces of Decay | To | Debating the Foreign Embassies Bill |
Message | The UFD are glad to see that there is a mutual understanding between our two parties concerning ethnic minorities and the way how to treat them. Full support for this bill. |
Date | 14:27:19, June 14, 2010 CET | From | Hutorian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Foreign Embassies Bill |
Message | Madam Speaker, back then the NSC was in opposition. Now we are in power and can do whatever we see fit - given the UFD's support obviously. The CLP have been blown out of the water by the electorate, they are a party of past generations and should just pack in politics altogether. The CLP are stuck in the past and thats why they have only 30MP's |
Date | 15:00:04, June 14, 2010 CET | From | Conservative-Libertarian Party (UM) | To | Debating the Foreign Embassies Bill |
Message | Madam Speaker, we have been lower than 30 MPs before, and come back and governed for a generation, so the party opposite should not act with such complacency. The CLP is the oldest party here and the electorate respect that. We have had a bad election, there is no getting away from that. But we can very easily come back. Madam Speaker, just look at the contempt with which the NSC treat the electorate. "Now we are in power and can do whatever we see fit". They would do anything, Madam Speaker. They have no respect for Parliament, no respect for the people and no respect for the country. Madam Speaker, when they were in opposition, they demanded that the Labour Party would answer their questions. They said it is the responsibility of the government to answer questions. Now they are back in power, and can do as they wish, will the NSC once again dismiss the CLP as "irrelevant" or will they answer our questions, given the fuss they caused previously? |
Date | 15:03:58, June 14, 2010 CET | From | Hutorian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Foreign Embassies Bill |
Message | Rt Hon Baroness Marelle, Prime Minister, Madam Speaker, i suppose we could answer CLP questions, although we dont much care for CLP opinion. The NSC has always been committed to democracy and we will stand by it. Yes, the NSC can do whatever we want - as long as the UFD agree. That is the workings of a Parliamentary majority! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes | Total Seats: 252 | ||
no | Total Seats: 139 | ||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Hundreds of vessels were lost while traversing the cold waters of the Sea of Lost Souls. It is located between Seleya and Majatra. |
Random quote: "He who turns his back on the left, looks at the right." - Johan Vande Lanotte |