Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5472
Next month in: 03:17:43
Server time: 16:42:16, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): hyraemous | R Drax | starfruit | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Rutanian Reform 2138

Details

Submitted by[?]: Freedom Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2139

Description[?]:

No company would pay a worker a low wage that they cant support their family on, the worker wouldnt take the job otherwise.

Why would a company hire someone on a wage they cant live on? they wouldnt because they want a productive happy worker, workers are not happy or productive if they aren't eating enough or supporting their family

There is no need for a minimum wage, a distortion on the free market that prevents people from competing for jobs and leads to unemployment.

If I have lower costs and am willing to offer my work for £5 hour than another worker who wants to work for £6 then i should get the job, however, if the minimum wage is

£6.20 then i cannot compete and offer to work for less as it is illegal to do so.

We also already have a minimum wage in effect, as the guaranteed minimum income means noone would accept a job that paid less or even slightly more a week than the minimum income.

There is no need for the Government to interfere here, why should the Government be interefering in the hobbies of the people? That is authoritarian and that is just big government.

Seeing as sports clubs consist of bowling clubs, cricket clubs, golf clubs, football sides, rugby clubs, i see no need for the Government to get involved.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date15:57:53, November 09, 2005 CET
FromRadical Freedom Party
ToDebating the Rutanian Reform 2138
MessageThe RFP opposes all of these. And would it kill you to at least TRY an argumentation why these things have anything in common? This is just bad, they measure all sorts of different things.

Date15:59:07, November 09, 2005 CET
FromRadical Freedom Party
ToDebating the Rutanian Reform 2138
MessageOOC: Really. I try to propose consistent policies at least when proposing multi-article bills. Do you have to insist on bringing all these unrelated issues to vote constantly? Or should we all begin proposing our party programmes for the stats instead of actually pretending that we want to get laws passed.

Date16:46:46, November 09, 2005 CET
From RSDP - Democratic Front
ToDebating the Rutanian Reform 2138
MessageFor the fourth. Against all others.

Date19:27:08, November 09, 2005 CET
FromLiberal Imperialist Party
ToDebating the Rutanian Reform 2138
MessageAye. I dont like the first one, but it's better than what we have now.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 272

no
    

Total Seats: 327

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: There are two countries based on Egypt in the game. Cobura is based on modern Egypt with a retro twist, while Hawu Mumenhes is based on Ancient Egypt with a modernist twist.

Random quote: "If the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual [gay] sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything!" - Rick Santorum

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 70