We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Pet Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Anarcho-Primitivist Concern
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2959
Description[?]:
| We believe that as human-animal interaction is not always straight-forward (for instance, people may care for a stray cat, or take in an animal, or look after a pet for a long time on someone else's behalf, or have an animal born, etc) that the current level of government interference into this area is unsuitable. Of course, animal welfare laws and laws on registering dangerous animals are still important. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the ownership of domestic animals as pets.
Old value:: People must register domestic animals with the local government.
Current: People must register domestic animals with the local government.
Proposed: There are no laws regarding domestic animal ownership.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:05:00, June 24, 2010 CET | From |  Marxist-Leninist Party of Ikradon (LL) | To | Debating the Pet Act |
| Message | We need registration of pets, inorder to make sure all pets are vaccinated properly, and to know how much money to put in pet's healthcare services. |
| Date | 02:16:00, June 24, 2010 CET | From | Marxist-Leninist Party of Ikradon (LL) | To | Debating the Pet Act |
| Message | We need registration of pets, inorder to make sure all pets are vaccinated properly, and to know how much money to put in pet's healthcare services. |
| Date | 06:32:31, June 24, 2010 CET | From | Union Socialism Alliance | To | Debating the Pet Act |
| Message | We would agree on Article One, whilst Article Two puts the safety of other people in the hands of a few, thus we can not agree. |
| Date | 19:12:31, June 24, 2010 CET | From | Art & Labour | To | Debating the Pet Act |
| Message | If article two is properly policed then we would marginally support. However, we are concerned about the danger this could pose to the general public. We feel article one is fine though. I think we can trust pet owners to be responsible in terms of vaccination and neutering etc. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 352 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 129 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 269 |
| Random fact: "Jezvraljogadsrlji" means "Social" in the Jelbic languages. |
| Random quote: "Let's not forget that we belong to history, that history that men and women who fought before did, that history that men and women who are fighting now will do." - Tera Pisthis, former Selucian politician |