Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5461
Next month in: 02:43:59
Server time: 01:16:00, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): ADM Drax | hexaus18 | R Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: The United Malkut Act.

Details

Submitted by[?]: Am Echad, Pays Libre

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2961

Description[?]:

Our hope is not yet lost!
Od lo avdah tikvateinu
Notre espoir n’est pas encore perdu

Note: Any singing of the national anthem may be sung in all languages or in any language of your choosing.

The nation's name will be changed to the Malkut of Beiteynu.
Yishelem shall no longer be referred to as a separate entity from Beiteynu.
For now and forever more the date of this bill passing will be a national holiday.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:03:15, June 27, 2010 CET
FromBismarckian National Resistance (BNR)
ToDebating the The United Malkut Act.
MessageWe support.

Date07:39:17, June 28, 2010 CET
FromBDSP un Beys fun Yisserles-Binyomen
ToDebating the The United Malkut Act.
MessageOOC: The Av Beit Din is secondary to the Nasi. A simple Wikipedia search could tell you that.

Date07:45:05, June 28, 2010 CET
FromConstitutionalist Imperial League (IA)
ToDebating the The United Malkut Act.
MessageThis act is illegal and in clear and absolute violation of the Treaty of Poesy. There are no provisions for two Jewish kings and there are no provisions for the Commonwealth to be called anything other than what it is known now. The Commonwealth and the Empire's ability to act are restricted by the Treaty of Poesy. We urge the CZP not to act foolishly, breaches of the Treaty can lead to war and that is the very last thing we all want.

Luthori could be willing to reexamine certain portions of the Treaty in the future however we again state this act is illegal and cannot pass.

Date07:51:55, June 28, 2010 CET
FromConstitutionalist Imperial League (IA)
ToDebating the The United Malkut Act.
MessageADDENDUM: It is obvious that the two Jeiwsh "kings" are traitors to the Commonwealth and it would be beyond absurd to recognize their ridiculous claim.

Date08:32:36, June 28, 2010 CET
FromBDSP un Beys fun Yisserles-Binyomen
ToDebating the The United Malkut Act.
MessageThe Jewish kings have since time immemorial been the leaders of the Jewish people. They do not deny the claim of Luthori to the government of Beiteynu, they only wish for recognition as the leaders of the Jewish people. What say you of the DSPB's proposal which more rightly respects Luthori.

Date10:39:57, June 28, 2010 CET
FromConstitutionalist Imperial League (IA)
ToDebating the The United Malkut Act.
MessageWe are willing to discuss some sort of position for these Jewish "kings" with the DSPB and are not hostile to their recognition as religious leaders of the Jewish people. However, we wish to directly negotiate with the DSPB before such a bill is proposed to the Commonwealth Parliament.

Thus, since the King-Emperor has not discussed these issues with the DSPB yet, we ask you please to oppose this bill so that we may work out an agreement which respects your wish to have Jewish religious leaders and which also is legal.

Date12:03:51, June 28, 2010 CET
FromAm Echad, Pays Libre
ToDebating the The United Malkut Act.
MessageWe are willing to tone down our wishes as well. As we have been calling for a meeting on issues like this for a very long time. This was a wake up call, for Luthori to finally talk to us.

Date18:49:23, June 28, 2010 CET
FromChristian Imperial Party
ToDebating the The United Malkut Act.
MessageThe CIP will not stand for this. George III rules by the grace of God over this nation and no man should take that away. Despite the attempts to strip him of his rights he will forever remain the religious and political leader of the Commonwealth.

If disloyal politlical parties push us into a war with the Empire we will fight with the King-Emperor.

Date20:12:40, June 28, 2010 CET
FromConstitutionalist Imperial League (IA)
ToDebating the The United Malkut Act.
MessageThe CZP arrogance's is certainly not welcome. Luthori has been willing to discuss with everyone for a long time.

The CIP's loyalty was expected and will be rewarded.

Date20:15:11, June 28, 2010 CET
FromAm Echad, Pays Libre
ToDebating the The United Malkut Act.
MessageWe have seen nothing done, and wanted action to be made quickly. We will vote no on this bill, and have a conference with you ASAP. In order to figure out the future of our people.

Date21:49:57, June 28, 2010 CET
FromBismarckian National Resistance (BNR)
ToDebating the The United Malkut Act.
MessageThe BNR must vote no for now because we were under the impression this was not against the Treaty of Poesy. As it is, we believe the best and most sensible option is to renegotiate with the CIL. The BNR would be glad to carry out/assist in the renegotiations if they are to take place.

Date07:52:26, June 29, 2010 CET
FromAm Echad, Pays Libre
ToDebating the The United Malkut Act.
MessageWe will vote no, in order to begin descussion with the Luthoris.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 26

no
   

Total Seats: 49

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: For more information on Particracy's former colonial nations, check out http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6640

    Random quote: "If homosexuality is a disease, let's all call in queer to work. 'Hello. Can't work today; still queer.'" - Robin Tyler

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 95