Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5474
Next month in: 03:12:53
Server time: 12:47:06, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): echizen | itsjustgav | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Fist of the Law

Details

Submitted by[?]: First Wave Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2962

Description[?]:

Law is strength, but the strength of the law lies in the men who enforce it, they cannot enforce their full strength when they can be questioned as lords of the law by common people. This law will ensure that the law, and the state, cannot be disobeyed.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date10:51:32, June 30, 2010 CET
FromConstitutionalist Imperial League (IA)
ToDebating the Fist of the Law
MessageMr Speaker,

There are some articles in this bill that we support. We would not be against limiting appeals although we find it distasteful to band them altogether, judgement are given by human beings who are imperfect and thus liable to error. Furthermore, we would like to ask the FWP to elaborate on why we need article 2 passed, if it can convince us, we will support it. We believe article 3 is extreme. While torture can be a very effective tool in the right circumstances, it should not be applied for whatever offense a police officer thinks merits it. Finally, article 4 has our full support.

We encourage the FWP to leave the bill in debate phase longer in the future.

I yield.

Date10:51:33, June 30, 2010 CET
FromConstitutionalist Imperial League (IA)
ToDebating the Fist of the Law
MessageMr Speaker,

There are some articles in this bill that we support. We would not be against limiting appeals although we find it distasteful to band them altogether, judgement are given by human beings who are imperfect and thus liable to error. Furthermore, we would like to ask the FWP to elaborate on why we need article 2 passed, if it can convince us, we will support it. We believe article 3 is extreme. While torture can be a very effective tool in the right circumstances, it should not be applied for whatever offense a police officer thinks merits it. Finally, article 4 has our full support.

We encourage the FWP to leave the bill in debate phase longer in the future.

I yield.

Date12:48:04, June 30, 2010 CET
FromFirst Wave Party
ToDebating the Fist of the Law
MessageThis article was left in debate phase for a significant period.

Illegal aliens drain without giving back, take without justifying taking and rely upon the illegal acts of others. That they exist within our nation is a show of illegality in itself, the effect they have upon it is why they should be actively found and expelled. They can only survive off the illegal acts of others, and as beyond the law, are far from all laws which benefit the nation, whilst thriving breaking those which protect it from harm.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
 

Total Seats: 21

abstain
    

Total Seats: 158


Random fact: Any RP law granting extraordinary "emergency powers" or dictator-like powers to a government must be passed by at least a 2/3rds majority, but (like all RP laws) may always be overturned by a simple majority vote of the legislature.

Random quote: "We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant." - Karl Popper

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 64