Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5475
Next month in: 01:47:50
Server time: 18:12:09, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): AethanKal | Paulo Nogueira | SE33 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of February 2138

Details

Submitted by[?]: Progressive Social Liberty Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2138

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date09:21:59, November 09, 2005 CET
FromProgressive Social Liberty Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2138
Messagethis would be the best course of action. It gives a clear working majority for a govt. as it also gives stability with parties belonging to it sharing most of the same intrests. the voters have given a clear signal they're leary of the conservative govt. delivered in the last election asthe conservative/moderate coalition can no longer muster a majority and theyve alienated any possible working relations in the near future.

Date14:54:16, November 09, 2005 CET
FromAldurian Libertarian Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2138
MessageWe agree to be part of a coalition government.

Date08:25:39, November 10, 2005 CET
FromUnited Socialist Front
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2138
MessageI'm afraid you should have counted the seats, my friend...
The NACP has offered more the MSP (if they may even be called Socialist) than you did here.
And in order to out do both of them, we would need the AMs, but they have no place here, and won't vote for us, and so this coalition, even with our votes, won't work.
Perhaps give more positions to the MSP? or the AMs?
In any case, this "Front Populaire" will need revising.
We'll still vote yes, of course...

Date15:51:05, November 10, 2005 CET
FromAldurian Libertarian Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2138
MessageI agree with the USF. We sould allocate seats to the moderate and see if the MSP is interested in a coalition government in the first place.

Date18:10:29, November 10, 2005 CET
FromProgressive Social Liberty Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2138
Messageagreed, lets give it a try

Date18:10:39, November 10, 2005 CET
FromProgressive Social Liberty Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2138
Messageagreed, lets give it a try

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 179

no
  

Total Seats: 182

abstain
   

Total Seats: 40


Random fact: Submitting a bill without any proposals in it will not attract or detract voters. It will not raise your visibility or change your political position.

Random quote: "I bet their mothers don't love them. Many Trigunian women are so cold. I mean it's a racist hellhole in parts." - Tirza Sommer, former Dorvish politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 57