Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 4440
Next month in: 03:46:09
Server time: 04:13:50, August 18, 2018 CET
Currently online (4): DankuDaddy | pandowlpaws | SkinnerBenn | WuHán | Record: 63 on 23:28:53, August 06, 2007 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Puritanism sucks (I)

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberty Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2139

Description[?]:

If people want to watch porn, let them.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:57:31, November 10, 2005 CET
FromHerut Orthodoxy
ToDebating the Puritanism sucks (I)
MessageWow, how dolt... um, bold.

Date01:08:13, November 10, 2005 CET
FromRed Octopus Party
ToDebating the Puritanism sucks (I)
MessageThis bill only encourages the development of exploitative industries.

Date02:57:49, November 10, 2005 CET
FromLiberty Party
ToDebating the Puritanism sucks (I)
MessageNo, the enthusiasm of people to work in these 'exploitative' industries encourages its development. This bill only lets people do what they want to do.

Date00:04:45, November 11, 2005 CET
FromRed Octopus Party
ToDebating the Puritanism sucks (I)
MessageWhat you see as enthusiasm, we only see as desperation for work. We must provide the desperate with a better means of living than this.

Date00:20:43, November 11, 2005 CET
FromLiberty Party
ToDebating the Puritanism sucks (I)
MessageWhat you see as desperation, we see as freedom of choice. What you see as 'must provide', we see as 'must impose'.

If you want to give poor people money, you should be free to do so, if you want to not see porn, watch a non-porn channel, but leave everyone else alone.

Date05:59:21, November 11, 2005 CET
FromPartiya Natsional'noy Gordyy
ToDebating the Puritanism sucks (I)
MessageWe believe it is not a matter of the state to decide on what you migt or might not watch on your screen. It is up to the broadcast cooperations. If viewers do no like the programming they can switch to eg TTV 2. Furthermore organizations can try to influence the policy of broadcasting cooperations.

Date08:30:22, November 11, 2005 CET
FromRed Octopus Party
ToDebating the Puritanism sucks (I)
MessageThose who are desperate for work/out of work are not free to choose their workplace. They will take disgusting jobs to put food on their tables, and we believe that this is one of those particular industries which is naturally more exploitative than any other particular bourgeois industry, as the exploitation is especially tangible. We will continue to vote against this bill.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 282

no
   

Total Seats: 156

abstain
 

Total Seats: 117


Random fact: A Party Organisation will be eligible for deletion if it is more than 30 IG (in-game) years old and does not have a minimum of 1 active member ("active member" meaning an active member who has leadership or full member status) who is listed with no more than 20 organisations.

Random quote: "A countryman between two lawyers is like a fish between two cats." - Benjamin Franklin

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 63