We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Constitution
Details
Submitted by[?]: Stanton House
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2970
Description[?]:
a |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The number of proposals a party can introduce per year (will be handed out as a monthly quota).
Old value:: 5
Current: 20
Proposed: 3
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The maximum proposal quota a party can accumulate.
Old value:: 50
Current: 25
Proposed: 25
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The length of a legislative and executive term, in months. Should be between 24 and 72.
Old value:: 42
Current: 60
Proposed: 36
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 19:22:52, July 15, 2010 CET | From | House Elfrink | To | Debating the Constitution |
Message | I believe this is an unfair move by the liberal democratic parties/the capitalists/the republicanists to restrict the voices of our noble house and even our rival Zog House. We oppose this. And we hope, Inshallah, that your "spirit of democracy" will call out to you in it's conscious to stop your self-depreciating move. |
Date | 19:32:48, July 15, 2010 CET | From | Stanton House | To | Debating the Constitution |
Message | yes i will like to amoute you that youy ai new party i will work with you but you setin do not how party are going to vote i bouthe this bill in befor and the liberal democratilc did vote yes howert the quota are only i index that can be chaner and hopwif if will stop lot bills that take anmeru for outhere party to reed i will not incre the quota but i will dertghe the if need the outher be of the bill are not go to be derthe but the capital city part of the bill can be chanerg |
Date | 22:54:03, July 15, 2010 CET | From | Constitutional Monarchy Party | To | Debating the Constitution |
Message | I agree to changing the Capital city, but I am content with the rest of the constitution as it stands. |
Date | 23:00:42, July 15, 2010 CET | From | Stanton House | To | Debating the Constitution |
Message | how are youre going to vote and is the anmert amenteu or derthu you to make you vote yes i sertd tha t mouth betwer is vote need to be look and the amoute of MP need to be look at alsoth |
Date | 04:07:35, July 16, 2010 CET | From | People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia | To | Debating the Constitution |
Message | Remove the change of Capital city and the change in number of seats and we may support. |
Date | 13:24:55, July 16, 2010 CET | From | Stanton House | To | Debating the Constitution |
Message | how are you going to vote on the way the bill look now abourt the cancet city and the murct of MP can you pivrer message |
Date | 18:30:28, July 16, 2010 CET | From | Constitutional Monarchy Party | To | Debating the Constitution |
Message | Put the proposal for the capital city in a seperate bill, I will vote yes for that change. I will not support the other proposals. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 156 | |||
no | Total Seats: 344 | |||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Particracy does not allow official national flags of real-life nations or flags which are very prominent and recognisable (eg. the flags of the European Union, the United Nations, Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union or the Confederate States of America). |
Random quote: "Without opposition there is no politics." - Alun Daffys, former Alorian politician |