We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Improving National Defense Act Of 2138
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic-Republican Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2139
Description[?]:
To improve our country's security the following is proposed |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on the separation of the police and the military.
Old value:: A civilian police force is in place and the military is not allowed to play any part in it.
Current: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Proposed: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 15:05:35, November 10, 2005 CET | From | Jakanian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Improving National Defense Act Of 2138 |
Message | supported |
Date | 16:12:20, November 10, 2005 CET | From | Ogden Sinclair Party | To | Debating the Improving National Defense Act Of 2138 |
Message | Opposed |
Date | 03:20:22, November 11, 2005 CET | From | Islamic Nationalist Front | To | Debating the Improving National Defense Act Of 2138 |
Message | OOC: I have mixed feelings. JCP, care to back up your view? |
Date | 21:16:29, November 11, 2005 CET | From | Democratic-Republican Party | To | Debating the Improving National Defense Act Of 2138 |
Message | It is our party's belief that we must allow for the miltary to help protect law and order when the civilian police is cannot maintain order in sitiuations like national emergencies |
Date | 02:53:56, November 12, 2005 CET | From | Jakanian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Improving National Defense Act Of 2138 |
Message | IF Police go on strike, as permitted by Jakanian Law, who will patrol the streets? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 46 | |||
no | Total Seats: 172 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 32 |
Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
Random quote: "The communist revolution is the most radical rupture with traditional property relations; no wonder that its development involves the most radical rupture with traditional ideas." - Karl Marx |