We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: National Internet Act of November 2974
Details
Submitted by[?]: Christian People's Party (IA)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2975
Description[?]:
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on internet service providers (ISPs).
Old value:: There is a single privately-owned internet service provider, whose monopoly is guaranteed by law.
Current: Private companies provide internet service throughout the nation, without government interference.
Proposed: The government controls and provides internet service throughout the nation. Private ISPs are banned.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:09:45, July 27, 2010 CET | From | Constitutionalist Imperial League (IA) | To | Debating the National Internet Act of November 2974 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, Similarly to other such nationalization acts, we believe this one to be unconstitutional. I yield. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 124 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 52 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 25 |
| Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
| Random quote: "It depends upon what the meaning of the word 'is' is." - Bill Clinton |