We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Small Reform Bill on Military
Details
Submitted by[?]: Common Sense Conservatives
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2977
Description[?]:
| A few proposed changes to the military system. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: The state owns all defence industries.
Current: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Proposed: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:28:46, July 29, 2010 CET | From | Common Sense Conservatives | To | Debating the Small Reform Bill on Military |
| Message | The reason for this is contracts to privatly owned defence industries can provide a boast to the economy. This is seen in many cases in history. |
| Date | 21:17:25, July 29, 2010 CET | From | The CFoG | To | Debating the Small Reform Bill on Military |
| Message | Also better technologies and thus improved defence. Good Call. |
| Date | 21:44:15, July 29, 2010 CET | From | Common Sense Conservatives | To | Debating the Small Reform Bill on Military |
| Message | No we wait and see if the bigger parties like it. |
| Date | 02:37:31, July 30, 2010 CET | From | Common Sense Conservatives | To | Debating the Small Reform Bill on Military |
| Message | Now I'd like to ask, What is wrong with this bill Alianza del Norte? |
| Date | 05:25:56, July 30, 2010 CET | From | Northern Alliance | To | Debating the Small Reform Bill on Military |
| Message | We do not like the idea of private companies gaining the capacity to create their own private armies. |
| Date | 06:07:48, July 30, 2010 CET | From | Common Sense Conservatives | To | Debating the Small Reform Bill on Military |
| Message | What about private companies getting contracts by the government, which provides a boost to the economy? They work alongside the government, because the government is the one who gives them contracts. That doesn't mean they own their own private army. |
| Date | 06:40:22, July 30, 2010 CET | From | Northern Alliance | To | Debating the Small Reform Bill on Military |
| Message | They have the capability to arm paramilitary groups. We do not think that allowing them to do this is in the best interests of the states. |
| Date | 06:56:37, July 30, 2010 CET | From | Common Sense Conservatives | To | Debating the Small Reform Bill on Military |
| Message | Anyways Paramilitary groups do not get their arms from private companies. Private companies insure more jobs are made and more money goes back to the people of our nation. Furthermore, what if the government goes into deep recession and/or depression then defence plumets with no other compaines to supply more arms then what will happen? It also gives a chance to have better technology to come up and as the other party said, improved defence. Private companies also allows more entrepreneurship to sprout up. |
| Date | 07:15:25, July 30, 2010 CET | From | Northern Alliance | To | Debating the Small Reform Bill on Military |
| Message | Our position is set. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 398 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 202 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy allows you to establish an unelected head of state like a monarch or a president-for-life, but doing this is a bit of a process. First elect a candidate with the name "." to the Head of State position. Then change your law on the "Structure of the executive branch" to "The head of state is hereditary and symbolic; the head of government chairs the cabinet" and change the "formal title of the head of state" to how you want the new head of state's title and name to appear (eg. King Percy XVI). |
| Random quote: "I do not believe that the United States should be bound by the same rules as the smallest African nation. Life isn't like that." - Richard Perle |