We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Budget proposal of June 2976

Details

Submitted by^[?]: Common Sense Conservatives

Status^[?]: passed

Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2977

Description^[?]:

The Common Sense Conservatives propose to adjust the government's spending budget to better address the economic and social situation of the Gaduridosland. (revised bill)

We believe we must take serious cuts to reduce national deficits, we will gladly vote to raise spending again when and only when we have a surplus, and it doesn't bring us back into debt again.

Proposals

Article 1

Ministry	Current Budget	Old Budget	Propesed Budget
Head of Government	500,000,000 GAD	500,000,000 GAD	300,000,000 GAD
Foreign Affairs	500,000,000 GAD	1,500,000,000 GAD	1,500,000,000 GAD
Internal Affairs	100,000,000,000 GAD	210,000,000,000 GAD	125,000,000,000 GAD
Finance	50,000,000,000 GAD	200,000,000 GAD	200,000,000 GAD
Defence	10,000,000,000 GAD	25,000,000,000 GAD	25,000,000,000 GAD
Justice	10,000,000,000 GAD	230,000,000,000 GAD	230,000,000,000 GAD
Infrastructure and Transport	500,000,000,000 GAD	2,000,000,000 GAD	2,000,000,000 GAD
Health and Social Services	1,100,000,000,000 GAD	28,500,000,000,000 GAD	18,500,000,000,000 GAD
Education and Culture	900,000,000,000 GAD	3,600,000,000,000 GAD	3,600,000,000,000 GAD
Science and Technology	500,000,000,000 GAD	100,000,000,000 GAD	100,000,000,000 GAD
Food and Agriculture	60,000,000,000 GAD	500,000,000,000 GAD	500,000,000,000 GAD
Environment and Tourism	60,000,000,000 GAD	2,530,000,000,000 GAD	1,430,000,000,000 GAD
Trade and Industry	400,000,000,000 GAD	130,000,000,000 GAD	130,000,000,000 GAD
Total	3,691,000,000,000 GAD	35,829,200,000,000 GAD	24,644,000,000,000 GAD

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date	21:35:12, July 29, 2010 CET
From	Common Sense Conservatives
To	Debating the Budget proposal of June 2976
Message	New revised bill

Date	21:37:04, July 29, 2010 CET
From	The CFoG
To	Debating the Budget proposal of June 2976
Message	Looks good to me.

Date	21:38:26, July 29, 2010 CET
From	Common Sense Conservatives
To	Debating the Budget proposal of June 2976
Message	Then I may go ahead and sen it to vote

Date	21:42:21, July 29, 2010 CET
From	The CFoG
To	Debating the Budget proposal of June 2976
Message	Sounds like a plan

Date	23:49:29, July 29, 2010 CET
From	The CFoG
To	Debating the Budget proposal of June 2976
Message	Alianze... Why No? What is wrong with this suggestion?

Date	23:59:36, July 29, 2010 CET
From	Northern Alliance
To	Debating the Budget proposal of June 2976
Message	We don't believe these budget cuts are right for the nation. We will propose our own cuts soon but we in government believe these are wrong. It is our responsibility to run the government and these cut hinder our ability to do so.

Date	00:00:22, July 30, 2010 CET
From	The CFoG
To	Debating the Budget proposal of June 2976
Message	Indeed but... What is wrong with them? Where do you find an issue?

Date	00:04:45, July 30, 2010 CET
From	Northern Alliance
To	Debating the Budget proposal of June 2976
Message	We are proposing a budget that should be acceptable to all.

Date	00:06:19, July 30, 2010 CET
From	The CFoG
To	Debating the Budget proposal of June 2976
Message	That's all good and proper but... I am interested in what you dislike about this one. Which areas of this budget cut specifically do you dislike.

Date	00:07:52, July 30, 2010 CET
From	Northern Alliance
To	Debating the Budget proposal of June 2976
Message	We are proposing a budget that should be acceptable to all.

Date	00:08:48, July 30, 2010 CET
From	The CFoG
To	Debating the Budget proposal of June 2976
Message	I don't question that... Please re-read my last question and respond to it.

Date	00:13:12, July 30, 2010 CET
From	Northern Alliance
To	Debating the Budget proposal of June 2976
Message	We are proposing a budget that should be acceptable to all.

Date	00:13:41, July 30, 2010 CET
From	Northern Alliance
To	Debating the Budget proposal of June 2976
Message	oops sorry for the double post. The decision has been changed and the budget will be supported.

Date	00:14:17, July 30, 2010 CET
From	Northern Alliance
To	Debating the Budget proposal of June 2976
Message	Quadruple post. Oops that was totally accidental not meant to be rude.

Date	00:14:28, July 30, 2010 CET
From	The CFoG
To	Debating the Budget proposal of June 2976
Message	I am not going to shut up until the question is answered. Which cut is it that has made you vote no?

Date	00:16:10, July 30, 2010 CET
From	Northern Alliance
To	Debating the Budget proposal of June 2976
Message	We are voting aye.

Date	00:16:19, July 30, 2010 CET
From	The CFoG
To	Debating the Budget proposal of June 2976
Message	In that case... wonderful... I know that the cut in tourism costs may not look to be great as it is one of our big things... but removing a deficit will enable us to offer better international trade (our other main income).

Date	00:17:39, July 30, 2010 CET
From	Northern Alliance
To	Debating the Budget proposal of June 2976
Message	Once again apologies for the accidental posts. We will be raising the tourism budget again eventually.

Date	00:18:19, July 30, 2010 CET
From	The CFoG
To	Debating the Budget proposal of June 2976
Message	Sounds like a good plan.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote

Seats

yes

Total Seats: 600

Total Seats: 0

abstain

Miss Gertrude Lawrence Party (0)

Total Seats: 0

Random fact: It is not allowed to call more than 5 elections in 5 game years in a nation. The default sanction for a player persisting in the early election tactic will be a seat reset.

Random quote: "The answer to global warming is in the abolition of private property and production for human need. A socialist world would place an enormous priority on alternative energy sources. This is what ecologically-minded socialists have been exploring for quite some time now." - Louis Proyect

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 68