Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5474
Next month in: 00:14:32
Server time: 11:45:27, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): GLNBei | Interstellar. | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Civil Liberties Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Sue's Corner

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2978

Description[?]:

Ensuring morality and religion shine through.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:41:47, August 01, 2010 CET
FromCoalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the Civil Liberties Bill
Message"The CUP stands firm by the right of sexually inexplicit individuals to dress as they please and by the rights of men and women to avoid abusive relationships and end their potentially damaging coircumstances by means of divorce."

Eleanore Lehres, CUP Senatorial Lead.

Date03:15:17, August 01, 2010 CET
FromSue's Corner
ToDebating the Civil Liberties Bill
MessageThey may 'stand firm' currently, but they used to support these principals. No backbone in the entire party.

Damon Burns, Party Leader.

Date16:17:33, August 01, 2010 CET
FromCoalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the Civil Liberties Bill
Message"The CUP has always supported equality under the law and individualism. Our methods of reaching these goals may have changed but our values remain solid. I suggest you read Aidan Fraer's Book; Redefining Solentian Conservatism: Same Goal, New Path."

Eleanore Lehres, CUP Senatorial Lead.

Date16:23:37, August 01, 2010 CET
FromSue's Corner
ToDebating the Civil Liberties Bill
MessageThis is a complete untruth. Any Solentian citizens, need not look at this book, but at the archives of senate history. They would find without looking very hard, that the CUP as they are now known, previously proposed bills which would ban crossdressing, that would ban gay couples from adopting and would ban gay people the same rights as others. How exactly has your political movement "always supported equality under the law and individualism" when one moment you are proposing something fairly right wing, the next you are supporting something liberal/left wing.

What has changed?

Date16:26:44, August 01, 2010 CET
FromCoalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the Civil Liberties Bill
Message"As stated, our goals remain the same, our methods have shifted. Conservative Unionism has always stood on these grounds. You are refering to the CMP, which is but half of our present movement. I note that the CMP also at times backed LGBT rights. You are obsessing over policies that were made hundreds of years ago, that just shows how truely out of touch your party really is."

Eleanore Lehres, CUP Senatorial Lead.

Date16:30:10, August 01, 2010 CET
FromSue's Corner
ToDebating the Civil Liberties Bill
MessageI cannot remember a single time when the CMP supported LGBT rights, call us out of touch, but the CMP at least had the backbone to stand by their morals and christian morals at that. We are a party of strong moral compassion, and are proud that Solentia still has one. You may call us out of touch, I say we are a party which is nostalgic for a soulmate like the CMP who would gladly support religious and moral legislation which at one time they would assist us with.

Damon Burns, Party leader.

Date21:41:59, August 01, 2010 CET
FromCoalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the Civil Liberties Bill
Message"If I remember my history lessons correctly sir, it was your own Party who declared the CMP immoral and irreligious for their stance on civil liberties!

http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=241200 - allowing Homosexuality in the Military and abolishing laws on sodomy"

Eleanore Lehres,
Senate Warden
CUP Senatorial Lead

Date22:51:12, August 01, 2010 CET
FromSue's Corner
ToDebating the Civil Liberties Bill
MessageThis legislation was a great deal after the time period we spoke of, we just found it strange the CMP came back and reformed, when it may as well have just had its members join the radical left, as the CUP defends a largely socialist record and introduces socialist ideas. But we recognise the debate has been lost as 51 are voting against this bill.

Damon Burns

Date23:14:27, August 01, 2010 CET
FromCoalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the Civil Liberties Bill
Message"The CUP is not socialist at all. We are socially individualist, a heavily Conservative ideal. We are economically centrist and reluctant to accept either extreme Capitalist or communist, again Conservative. And we are politically traditionalist, defending against constitutional reform; Conservative again. We catagorically reject that our ideology is leftist at all."

Eleanore Lehres,
Senate Warden
CUP Senatorial Lead

Date02:08:01, August 02, 2010 CET
FromSue's Corner
ToDebating the Civil Liberties Bill
MessageThe CUP supports the government subsidizing and creating a bigger state (socialist), they agree with gay rights (socialist), they agree with controlling peoples lives such as ignoring parental wishes with sex education (socialist/communist). The party may be right/liberal on some issues, but these days it is few and far between. The party has ditched its manifesto for a few jobs in government and is proposing socialist and big state ideas.

Damon Burns

Date02:44:18, August 02, 2010 CET
FromCoalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the Civil Liberties Bill
Message"The party that proposes bedroom legislation wants to talk records on statism and control? It's laughable. The CUP advocate logical, productive and progressive legislation that conform with ideals of maximum freedom to the individual and pragmatism. All children deserve to be educated as individuals without parents intervening and preventing the process. That is true freedom of the individual. I think the gentlemen has lost all credibility as a statesment in the suggestion that gay rights are a socialist ideal. Solentia does not want a bedroom-state as the ACP would have us under. We have rejected their statist suggestions in favour of individualism and pragmatism.

Maximum opportunities for our young people and the ability to start life equal to all around them and to process as individuals for the whole of their lives. THAT is what we are fighting for and legislation about."

Yvette Tekir, Secretary of State for Education and Culture.

Date03:40:19, August 02, 2010 CET
FromSue's Corner
ToDebating the Civil Liberties Bill
MessageThe education secretary should actually join me for a debate in the appropriate time allotted to her socialist and communist reforms of our education system. Her unpragmatic and backwards way of trying to undermine the individual is incredibly dangerous.

Margaret Ballantyne, Shadow Education Secretary.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 39

no
   

Total Seats: 51

abstain
  

Total Seats: 10


Random fact: Once approved, players should copy Cultural Protocols into a bill in the debate section of their nation page, under the title of "OOC: Cultural Protocols". This bill should include links to the passed Cultural Protocol bill and the Moderation approval.

Random quote: "[The Constitution preserves] the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation...[where] the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms." - James Madison

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 63