Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5472
Next month in: 00:55:15
Server time: 23:04:44, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): burgerboys | gattus | hexaus18 | LC73DunMHP | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of September 2138

Details

Submitted by[?]: Alliance 44

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2139

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:34:08, November 10, 2005 CET
From Society of Sadists
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2138
MessageVery well, we let Labour into the coalition for this term.
It would have been better to debate the cabinet before voting on it (we usually do this with private messages) but SoS keeps the Foreign Ministry which is our prime responsisbility for the time being.
Unfortunately we won't be able to pass any treaties - or update the national flag - without support from the LDP.

Date21:46:01, November 10, 2005 CET
From Alliance 44
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2138
MessageLabour intended to call for a government of national unity and thus decided to present the cabinet proposal without delay. We have carefully studied the situation and tried to set up a cabinet proposal acceptable to the majority of the House. We are delighted to see that our efforts seem to be meeeting the approval of the Senate. Will my hon. friend accept my apologies for the lack of the detailed debate?

Date21:53:10, November 10, 2005 CET
From Alliance 44
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2138
MessageOn behalf of the Labour party I would like to thank the Keynesian Party for supporting the cabinet proposal and demonstrating their strong dedication to the democratic values. We would also like to thank Chancellor Cambron for leading the House throught this crisis caused by the obstruction of the LDP and the ONUR.

Date00:19:01, November 11, 2005 CET
From Society of Sadists
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2138
MessageI doubt it was a matter of obstruction as much as simple ideological disunity.

Date05:56:09, November 11, 2005 CET
From Alliance 44
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2138
MessageTo me it rather looks inactivity than incompatibility of principles

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 57

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
        

    Total Seats: 43


    Random fact: Particracy allows you to establish an unelected head of state like a monarch or a president-for-life, but doing this is a bit of a process. First elect a candidate with the name "." to the Head of State position. Then change your law on the "Structure of the executive branch" to "The head of state is hereditary and symbolic; the head of government chairs the cabinet" and change the "formal title of the head of state" to how you want the new head of state's title and name to appear (eg. King Percy XVI).

    Random quote: "I start with the premise that the function of leadership is to produce more leaders, not more followers." - Ralph Nader

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 56