Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5471
Next month in: 00:55:29
Server time: 11:04:30, April 18, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): dannypk19 | Xalvas | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Workers Rights Bill (1) 2138

Details

Submitted by[?]: Worker's Freedom Alliance

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2139

Description[?]:

The withdrawal of labour is a fundamental right of every worker

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:31:18, November 10, 2005 CET
FromSocialist Republic Party
ToDebating the Workers Rights Bill (1) 2138
Messagediagree

Date00:31:01, November 11, 2005 CET
FromRoman Imperialist Party
ToDebating the Workers Rights Bill (1) 2138
MessageNo! Absolutely not! Critical workers going on strike RUIN nations. Performing MINIMAL service at least ensures that the nation won't go to ruin.

Date13:26:19, November 11, 2005 CET
FromPeople's Democratic Party
ToDebating the Workers Rights Bill (1) 2138
MessageDisagree as well.

Date13:55:34, November 11, 2005 CET
FromWorker's Freedom Alliance
ToDebating the Workers Rights Bill (1) 2138
MessageWhat you are basically saying is that the more important a workers is the less rights they have, which is pretty ridiculous

Date19:48:44, November 11, 2005 CET
FromRoman Imperialist Party
ToDebating the Workers Rights Bill (1) 2138
MessageThe wellbeing of the nation is greater than the wellbeing of a sect of workers.

Date00:52:56, November 12, 2005 CET
FromLabor Party
ToDebating the Workers Rights Bill (1) 2138
MessageAll workers should have the right to strike for they will be manipulated if they cant. They need the right for better work conditions, pay and safety conditions when needed and should be allowed to fight for those. The days of companies treating workers as cheap slave labour are gone.

Date01:16:52, November 12, 2005 CET
FromRoman Imperialist Party
ToDebating the Workers Rights Bill (1) 2138
Message"The good of the many outweighs the good of the few."

Date01:36:55, November 12, 2005 CET
FromWorker's Freedom Alliance
ToDebating the Workers Rights Bill (1) 2138
MessageThe workers are the majority - they create societies wealth - the state should not interfere when thay defend their interests

Date05:22:56, November 12, 2005 CET
FromRoman Imperialist Party
ToDebating the Workers Rights Bill (1) 2138
MessageA nation should be allowed to go into ruin because a sect of workers are unhappy at their jobs?

No, against.

Date13:43:26, November 12, 2005 CET
FromNew Daio Party
ToDebating the Workers Rights Bill (1) 2138
MessageDidn't we defeat this already? Nothing's changed since then, against.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 64

no
    

Total Seats: 345

abstain
  

Total Seats: 92


Random fact: Moderation will not approve a Cultural Protocol request within the first 48 hours of it being requested. This is in order to give other players a chance to query the proposed changes, if they wish to do so. Moderation may be approached for advice on a proposed change, but any advice proffered should always be understood under the provisio that no final decision will be made until at least 48 hours after the request has been formally submitted for approval.

Random quote: "When anger rises, think of the consequences." - Confucius

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 76