Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5461
Next month in: 03:44:45
Server time: 16:15:14, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Caoimhean | HopesFor | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Morality and Pragmatics in Military

Details

Submitted by[?]: Sue's Corner

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2987

Description[?]:

Military bill

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:54:41, August 19, 2010 CET
From Coalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the Morality and Pragmatics in Military
Message"Explain in what way this is remotely pragmatic."

Henry, Lord Kennedy, CMP Senatorial Lead.

Date03:25:29, August 19, 2010 CET
From Sue's Corner
ToDebating the Morality and Pragmatics in Military
MessageIt is a sensible decision leading the way for more reform.

Dennis York
Shadow Defence

Date10:35:15, August 19, 2010 CET
From Coalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the Morality and Pragmatics in Military
Message"You believe lowering the number of Soldiers in our military to be pragmatic? How? I warn you that repeating that it is sensible does not explain how the move is pragmatic."

Henry, Lord Kennedy, CMP Senatorial Lead.

Date14:59:09, August 19, 2010 CET
From Sue's Corner
ToDebating the Morality and Pragmatics in Military
MessageThe move is a pragmatic one, because it is a sensible, matter of fact solution to a problem. Homosexuals should not have the right to serve in the military because they are not welcomed their by the others. If a military solider wants to fight why should he have to put up with a gay if he is religious? It makes no sense.

Dennis York
Shadow defence

Date16:50:25, August 19, 2010 CET
From Meritocratic Alliance
ToDebating the Morality and Pragmatics in Military
MessageWe care only the those in the military perform their duties and prove loyal to the republic. We have no interest in their amoral preferences. Indeed, what better place for them to form lasting bonds than in the military.

Date18:01:49, August 19, 2010 CET
From Social Renewal Party
ToDebating the Morality and Pragmatics in Military
MessageBy your very own (flawed) logical Mr York, why should an atheist homosexual be excluded from the military because of the preference of a religious heterosexual?

It is for security compromising proposals like this that I explicitly excluded your party from the cabinet. What a distaster it would be for your party to ever gain the levers of power in our Federal Republic.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 33

no
     

Total Seats: 56

abstain
 

Total Seats: 11


Random fact: The grey space in the east is populated by the forum-based countries, known in-game as the former colonies or the "Third World". These countries are managed by the Third World Coordinator but players can request control of individual countries in the Third World Control Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=8302

Random quote: "I am not a vegetarian because I love animals; I am a vegetarian because I hate plants." - A. Whitney Brown

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 62