Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5471
Next month in: 00:50:52
Server time: 07:09:07, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Xalvas | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: National Healthcare Act of 2991

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party of Solentia

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2993

Description[?]:

~

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:46:41, August 31, 2010 CET
FromSue's Corner
ToDebating the National Healthcare Act of 2991
MessageThe Unioists wish to 'ban private clinics' despite previously claiming we should have a system of choice and allow private and public to co-exist. Another u-turn for the ever changing party of both name and ideology.

Joy Beckett
Shadow Health Secretary

Date01:07:41, August 31, 2010 CET
FromCoalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the National Healthcare Act of 2991
Message"The Party of mandatory Religion wants to preach choice and u-turns. They are conservative, they are 'modern', they are religious, they are 'freedom', they want liberty, they want 'morality'. The Unionists support Articles 2 and 3 with a passion and see Article 1 as a good price to pay to get it. The Octagenarian doesn't like it? The bitch can rot in hell alongside the children that she kills by opposing these crucial vaccines."

Harrison Spicer, Sen.

Date01:15:19, August 31, 2010 CET
FromSue's Corner
ToDebating the National Healthcare Act of 2991
MessageThis bill is everything about freedom and individuality. Removing choice for parents over whether to vacinate their OWN CHILDREN whilst the state does it for them, the state paying for EVERY single prescription whatever the huge and overwhelming cost to the taxpayer and banning private sector involvement when they previously support a mix. They are nothing about choice, all about state. May we suggest there next party title for them? The Solentian Super Statist Party. Goes well with their new ideology, communism.

Joy Beckett
Shadow Health Secretary

Date01:18:23, August 31, 2010 CET
FromCoalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the National Healthcare Act of 2991
Message"Suggest what you want Madam, your opinion, as always, will be printed in the comic section of the national press."

Harrison Spicer, Sen.

Date01:20:14, August 31, 2010 CET
FromSue's Corner
ToDebating the National Healthcare Act of 2991
MessageWe would'nt be alone.

Joy Beckett.

Date01:57:02, August 31, 2010 CET
FromSocial Justice Party
ToDebating the National Healthcare Act of 2991
MessageThe SDWU could only support Article 2, we believe that as far as healthcare is concerned people should have the choice between a strong public sector alongside the private sector.

Sen. Carol Edwardes
SDWU Health Spokesperson

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 31

no
    

Total Seats: 60

abstain
 

Total Seats: 9


Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining.

Random quote: “Can anyone imagine a more perverse idea than forcing faithful Hosians like me to give away my money to enable irresponsible teenage girls to kill off their children because they were too drunk to use a damn condom?" - Dr. Francesca dos Santos, former Dranian politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 67