We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: National Healthcare Act of 2991
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party of Solentia
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2993
Description[?]:
~ |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Health care policy.
Old value:: There is a public health care system, but private clinics are allowed.
Current: There is a public health care system, but private clinics are allowed.
Proposed: Health care is entirely public and free; private clinics are banned.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Pharmaceutical drugs policy.
Old value:: The government subsidises the cost of pharmaceutical drugs for people on low incomes.
Current: The government pays partially for all citizens' pharmaceutical drugs, and pays entirely for those of low income citizens.
Proposed: The government pays for all citizens' pharmaceutical drugs.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's stance on vaccinations.
Old value:: The government encourages vaccinations for children, but does not enforce them.
Current: The government encourages vaccinations for children, but does not enforce them.
Proposed: The government mandates vaccination for all children.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 00:46:41, August 31, 2010 CET | From | Sue's Corner | To | Debating the National Healthcare Act of 2991 |
Message | The Unioists wish to 'ban private clinics' despite previously claiming we should have a system of choice and allow private and public to co-exist. Another u-turn for the ever changing party of both name and ideology. Joy Beckett Shadow Health Secretary |
Date | 01:07:41, August 31, 2010 CET | From | Coalition for National Unity [CNU] | To | Debating the National Healthcare Act of 2991 |
Message | "The Party of mandatory Religion wants to preach choice and u-turns. They are conservative, they are 'modern', they are religious, they are 'freedom', they want liberty, they want 'morality'. The Unionists support Articles 2 and 3 with a passion and see Article 1 as a good price to pay to get it. The Octagenarian doesn't like it? The bitch can rot in hell alongside the children that she kills by opposing these crucial vaccines." Harrison Spicer, Sen. |
Date | 01:15:19, August 31, 2010 CET | From | Sue's Corner | To | Debating the National Healthcare Act of 2991 |
Message | This bill is everything about freedom and individuality. Removing choice for parents over whether to vacinate their OWN CHILDREN whilst the state does it for them, the state paying for EVERY single prescription whatever the huge and overwhelming cost to the taxpayer and banning private sector involvement when they previously support a mix. They are nothing about choice, all about state. May we suggest there next party title for them? The Solentian Super Statist Party. Goes well with their new ideology, communism. Joy Beckett Shadow Health Secretary |
Date | 01:18:23, August 31, 2010 CET | From | Coalition for National Unity [CNU] | To | Debating the National Healthcare Act of 2991 |
Message | "Suggest what you want Madam, your opinion, as always, will be printed in the comic section of the national press." Harrison Spicer, Sen. |
Date | 01:20:14, August 31, 2010 CET | From | Sue's Corner | To | Debating the National Healthcare Act of 2991 |
Message | We would'nt be alone. Joy Beckett. |
Date | 01:57:02, August 31, 2010 CET | From | Social Justice Party | To | Debating the National Healthcare Act of 2991 |
Message | The SDWU could only support Article 2, we believe that as far as healthcare is concerned people should have the choice between a strong public sector alongside the private sector. Sen. Carol Edwardes SDWU Health Spokesperson |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 31 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 60 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 9 |
Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
Random quote: “Can anyone imagine a more perverse idea than forcing faithful Hosians like me to give away my money to enable irresponsible teenage girls to kill off their children because they were too drunk to use a damn condom?" - Dr. Francesca dos Santos, former Dranian politician |