Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5473
Next month in: 02:57:10
Server time: 13:02:49, April 23, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): Kubrick2 | Tayes_Gad | Vesica5 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: National Welfare Act of 2991

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party of Solentia

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2993

Description[?]:

~

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:48:52, August 31, 2010 CET
FromSue's Corner
ToDebating the National Welfare Act of 2991
MessageAgain, the unioists vote to ban private sector involvement and extend child beneift to EVERY Family and EVERY child despite the fact that incredibly rich people will get the benefits, which will mean more tax rises for more people to pay for ever more and often unnecessary benefits for people who are very rich and don't need these benefits.

Joy Beckett
Shadow Health Secretary

Date01:10:03, August 31, 2010 CET
FromCoalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the National Welfare Act of 2991
Message"Yes. We believe in helping every child, because every child matters and deserves equal treatment.Children, Ms. Beckett, are more than figures in your economics textbook. They should not and will not be punished for the wealth of their parents."

Harrison Spicer, Sen.

Date01:18:22, August 31, 2010 CET
FromSue's Corner
ToDebating the National Welfare Act of 2991
MessageThey will when they grow up and have to pay mass taxation as a result of this irreposnbility Mrs. Spicer. This will not only waste money at the expense of the taxpayer by giving rich families even more money, but it will continue the poverty gap between rich and poor. If rich children are to recieve child benefit, the exact same sum as poor children, how exactly will this shortern the gap between rich and poor? It won't. It will do nthing for equality and will waste money. By all means extend money to poor families, but to the already rich and prosperous? No thanks.

Joy Beckett

Date01:20:12, August 31, 2010 CET
FromCoalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the National Welfare Act of 2991
Message"The gap, the gap, the precious gap. If the gap is larger but everyone is better off as a result, thats a price we'll pay Mr. Beckket."

Harrison Spicer, Sen.

Date01:24:15, August 31, 2010 CET
FromSue's Corner
ToDebating the National Welfare Act of 2991
MessageIt isn't a price you will pay, it is a price the taxpayers and future generations would

Joy Beckett
Shadow Health

Date01:25:05, August 31, 2010 CET
FromCoalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the National Welfare Act of 2991
Message"That is correct yes. A bigger gap in exchange for a better society. Fair deal to us Mr. Beckett."

Harrison Spicer, Sen.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 58

no
   

Total Seats: 33

abstain
 

Total Seats: 9


Random fact: In general, role-play requires the consent of all players.

Random quote: "If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator." - George W. Bush

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 62