Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5473
Next month in: 02:15:45
Server time: 13:44:14, April 23, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): Ost | rezins | starfruit | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Treaty Withdrawal - Dovani First

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberaldemokratische Allianz

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2995

Description[?]:

.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date05:53:43, September 01, 2010 CET
From Liberaldemokratische Allianz
ToDebating the Treaty Withdrawal - Dovani First
MessageThe LDA cannot support treaties that give the blessing of Hulstrian protection to Dovani territory possessed by a non-Dovanian nation without historical ties to the continent. The treaty must be amended to exclude territory of Rutania on the Dovani continent from Sections 2, 3, and 4 of Article I.

Date18:57:44, September 03, 2010 CET
From Konstitutionelle Monarchie Partei
ToDebating the Treaty Withdrawal - Dovani First
MessageThis treaty only deals with territories with concerns to non-aggression, not recognition. Plus, 99.9% of the treaty deals with homeland Rutania, not it's colonies.

Date22:47:22, September 03, 2010 CET
From Liberaldemokratische Allianz
ToDebating the Treaty Withdrawal - Dovani First
MessageArticle 1, Sections 2,3, and 4 all apply to Rutanian colonies; they would have us use Hulstrian blood to defend their ill-gotten Dovanian territories.

Date06:06:36, September 05, 2010 CET
From Konstitutionelle Monarchie Partei
ToDebating the Treaty Withdrawal - Dovani First
MessageWe got our Caltropic lands from the same country they got theirs. Plus, Rutania and Hulstrian relations have improved quite well in the past few decades, withdrawing from this treaty only gives a bad message to the Commonwealth, and turns back relations.

Date07:01:41, September 05, 2010 CET
From Liberaldemokratische Allianz
ToDebating the Treaty Withdrawal - Dovani First
MessageWe are a Dovanian nation; they are not. Rutania and Hulstria can, and should be, friends and allies but the LDA will not support a treaty that pledges Hulstrian blood and treasure in the defense of Rutanian-controlled territory in Dovani. We can have non-aggression - and by no means is the LDA advocating hostility towards Rutania or a desire to expand the Hulstrian Empire. We can have mutual defense that covers all other Rutanian territory, but those territories must be outside of the agreement.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 417

no
  

Total Seats: 308

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Culturally Open nations can adopt advisory/non-enforceable Nation Descriptions. See http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6242

    Random quote: "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." - Aristotle

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 46