We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Omnibus Progessive Bill of 2993
Details
Submitted by[?]: Darnussian Unionist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2994
Description[?]:
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding bestiality (performing sexual acts with animals).
Old value:: Bestiality is illegal.
Current: Bestiality is illegal.
Proposed: Bestiality is legal and unregulated.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change National policy regarding the desecration of the national flag.
Old value:: The national flag may not be desecrated or dishonoured.
Current: The national flag may not be desecrated or used for commercial purposes.
Proposed: There are no regulations regarding the desecration or use of the national flag.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change
The government's policy regarding foreign marriages.
Old value:: Only foreign marriages that comply with domestic policy regarding marriage are recognised.
Current: Only foreign marriages that comply with domestic policy regarding marriage are recognised.
Proposed: All foreign marriages are recognised, regardless of domestic policy regarding marriage.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change National service.
Old value:: All adults upon completion of schooling can be required in times of war to serve a term in the military.
Current: All adults upon completion of schooling must serve a term in the military.
Proposed: There shall be no mandatory military or civilian national service.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change The recreational drug policy.
Old value:: Recreational drug use is regulated by local governments.
Current: Recreational drug use is forbidden.
Proposed: There are no laws regulating what citizens can put into their bodies.
Article 6
Proposal[?] to change Sexual education in schools.
Old value:: This decision is up to the schools themselves without government regulation.
Current: Schools have an obligation to give sexual education at some point in puberty.
Proposed: Schools have an obligation to give sexual education at some point in puberty.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 18:11:50, September 02, 2010 CET | From | Party for the Republic | To | Debating the Omnibus Progessive Bill of 2993 |
Message | We are not for unregulated drug use; otherwise, we support the proposals set forth wholeheartedly. |
Date | 18:12:07, September 02, 2010 CET | From | Party for the Republic | To | Debating the Omnibus Progessive Bill of 2993 |
Message | Also not for bestiality. |
Date | 18:26:54, September 02, 2010 CET | From | Darnussian Unionist Party | To | Debating the Omnibus Progessive Bill of 2993 |
Message | Its maximum civil liberties, whether other people agree with it or not. When parties say that they are not 'for' something like this they shoudl realise that not many people do it anyway and that people wont suddenly start doing it either if it became legalised. |
Date | 16:16:13, September 03, 2010 CET | From | Rerum Novarum Party | To | Debating the Omnibus Progessive Bill of 2993 |
Message | Sex with dogs, progressive thought! |
Date | 20:02:18, September 03, 2010 CET | From | Darnussian Unionist Party | To | Debating the Omnibus Progessive Bill of 2993 |
Message | Why prevent people from doing it if that is what they wish to do? Its not harming anyone even if it is obscene to many. |
Date | 06:48:13, September 04, 2010 CET | From | Rerum Novarum Party | To | Debating the Omnibus Progessive Bill of 2993 |
Message | It's harming the animal, no? |
Date | 10:29:45, September 04, 2010 CET | From | Darnussian Unionist Party | To | Debating the Omnibus Progessive Bill of 2993 |
Message | I'm quite sure that an animal, whether it be as small as a dog or larger, would react in a way that would show it. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 82 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 90 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 3 |
Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
Random quote: "I have no faith in political arithmetic." - Adam Smith |