We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Darnussian Constitutional Treaty Withdrawal
Details
Submitted by[?]: Party for the Republic
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2995
Description[?]:
| Darnussia needs a new constitution. The old one is outdated and is keeping Darnussia living in the past. |
Proposals
Article 1
Withdraw from the Darnussian Constitutional Treaty.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:09:42, September 03, 2010 CET | From | Communist Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Darnussian Constitutional Treaty Withdrawal |
| Message | The current constitution is dangerous. We NEED to get rid of this outdated piece of garbage. |
| Date | 01:36:55, September 04, 2010 CET | From | Christian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Darnussian Constitutional Treaty Withdrawal |
| Message | So much revolutionary thought in the legislature now... That is the danger, |
| Date | 06:15:23, September 11, 2010 CET | From | Libertarian Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Darnussian Constitutional Treaty Withdrawal |
| Message | If the general will of the people has changed so much that they are willing to change by ammendments the constitution; the general rule of law, then they will do such by the means provided to. Until that time, which cleary is not now, you will have to be satisfied with making laws within the framework of the constitution; the document that serves to represent the general will of the people. And because it indeed still does largerly represent the general will of the people, it highly unlikely that it is dangerous, rather, it provides people with the ability to predict the outcomes of certain actions that without an established rule of law to set up a framework, or a degree of predictabiltiy within that framework, would not be possible. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 61 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 111 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 3 |
| Random fact: Characters are considered to be "owned" by the player who first mentioned or created them. In practice, players may share responsibility for role-playing a character, but ultimate authority rests with the owner. |
| Random quote: "It makes no difference, in principle, if this 'collective will' is divined by the edicts of a dictator or by majority vote, so long as the rights of the individual may still be sacrificed." - Robert Garmong |