We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cosmetics Research Regulation II
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Centrists
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2140
Description[?]:
| In order to ensure that cosmetics research does not become abusive, we believe that their use of test animals should be subject to at least some regulation. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The use of animals in cosmetics research.
Old value:: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is unregulated.
Current: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is regulated.
Proposed: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is regulated.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 06:48:12, November 14, 2005 CET | From | Communist Fascist And Anarchial Party | To | Debating the Cosmetics Research Regulation II |
| Message | how about banning it completely??? do we really need cosmetics???? is it an essential part of our lives? even if we need it, are there any cosmetics out there that have not already been made, and is there a use for them???? don't oyu think we have enough cosmetics already on the market, and that anything new, isnt really going to expand on that? do you not feel that cosmetics further demotes the natural body image of people, and encourages them to hide under a n unnatural shell? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 422 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 278 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: After 3 days (72 hours) your account will be inactivated by Moderation. If you want to be reactivated you can request reactivation located here: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4360 |
| Random quote: "Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end." - John Dalberg-Acton |