We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Infrastructure Reform
Details
Submitted by[?]: Party for a Brighter Future
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2999
Description[?]:
| Just some more ideas |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent domain compensation (if eminent domain is legal).
Old value:: A neutral body appointed by the courts determines the compensation, either party may appeal.
Current: The government does not compensate victims of eminent domain.
Proposed: The victim of eminent domain sets compensation, government can appeal to the courts if they deem the cost too high.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on the nation's power grid.
Old value:: Each region owns and maintains its own power grid.
Current: The national grid is fully owned by the state.
Proposed: The national grid is fully owned by the state.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government policy regarding housing.
Old value:: The state contracts with private companies to provide public housing.
Current: The state provides public housing to low-income families.
Proposed: The state provides public housing to low-income families.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Train Operating Companies (TOC).
Old value:: Private companies operate TOCs throughout the country.
Current: The State owns and operates a national TOC, alongside private TOCs.
Proposed: The State owns and operates a national TOC, alongside private TOCs.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 03:51:34, September 10, 2010 CET | From | Party for a Brighter Future | To | Debating the Infrastructure Reform |
| Message | Just tell me what you agree and disagree with. |
| Date | 04:33:04, September 10, 2010 CET | From | National Democratic Party of Aldegar | To | Debating the Infrastructure Reform |
| Message | 1, 2 , 5 and 6 are good |
| Date | 08:12:31, September 10, 2010 CET | From | People's Party - Republican Democrats | To | Debating the Infrastructure Reform |
| Message | This is mostly unacceptable for the PP-CDU, which has long promoted a policy of allowing private enterprise with strong regulations. |
| Date | 22:50:50, September 10, 2010 CET | From | Party for a Brighter Future | To | Debating the Infrastructure Reform |
| Message | Are there any points that you would actually concede on or would be willing to look into at all? |
| Date | 15:04:22, September 11, 2010 CET | From | People's Party - Republican Democrats | To | Debating the Infrastructure Reform |
| Message | Of these, there are no points we could support. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 126 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 73 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Before choosing a nation, you may wish to research it first. For more information on the cultural backgrounds of the nations, please see the Cultural Protocols Index: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6365 |
| Random quote: "Even when laws have been written down, they ought not always to remain unaltered." - Aristotle |