Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5474
Next month in: 00:23:04
Server time: 15:36:55, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): itsjustgav | JWDL | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Individual Liberty Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Libertarian Freedom Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 3006

Description[?]:

.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:28:07, September 27, 2010 CET
FromConstitutionalist Imperial League (IA)
ToDebating the Individual Liberty Bill
MessageMr Speaker,

Disregarding the fact that even if this bill passed, it is at best doubtful that many of these bills would be approved by the Imperial Committees, we kindly ask the Libertarian Freedom Party to abide by the Diet's regulations pertaining to the number of bills that may be sent to vote without debate per year. Current Imperial Law states that only 3 articles may be sent directly to debate every year and that all the others must be debated for at least one year before being sent to vote.

I yield.

Date21:01:03, September 27, 2010 CET
FromLibertarian Freedom Party
ToDebating the Individual Liberty Bill
MessageI am sure that the so-called Imperial Committee will not let the law be taken in effect even if it passes, if they are against it.

And the Imperial Law does not seem to apply to the Libertarian Freedom Party, as I could propose this bill without any complaints from the Imperial committee or any other institutions.

Date22:57:02, September 27, 2010 CET
FromConstitutionalist Imperial League (IA)
ToDebating the Individual Liberty Bill
MessageOOC: First of all, welcome to Luthori. In particracy, we distinguish between actions included in the game mechanics and actions not included in the game mechanics but nevertheless added for various reasons (realism, fun etc), this is now as role playing, or RP. Now, there's no way anybody can force you to obey RP laws and rules but it would be a courtesy to do so. The law I was refering to previously is the Parliamentary Debate Act of 2995 (http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=299972).

Also, if you haven't done so already, i strongly recommend you read this (http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=282420).

Date23:49:29, September 27, 2010 CET
FromLiberal Alliance
ToDebating the Individual Liberty Bill
MessageOOC: just for visibility

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 89

no
   

Total Seats: 112

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Particracy is completely free! If you want to support the game financially, feel free to make a small donation to the lievenswouter@gmail.com Paypal account.

    Random quote: "The truly powerful feed ideology to the masses like fast food while they dine on the most rarified delicacy of all: impunity." - Naomi Klein

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 100