Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5471
Next month in: 00:49:46
Server time: 15:10:13, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Dx6743 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Corporate Equality

Details

Submitted by[?]: Rationalist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2141

Description[?]:

If we are going to tax religions like companies, why are they not treated as companies with regards to advertising? The government of Telamon must fix this gross infraction.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:25:42, November 12, 2005 CET
FromRationalist Party
ToDebating the Corporate Equality
MessageI'm willing to go the other way on this as well, that is, not taxing religious organizations

Date18:36:30, November 12, 2005 CET
FromUnited Liberal Alliance
ToDebating the Corporate Equality
MessageThe UCA is happy with either arrangement and does see the RPs point about equality. I would probably rather tax religious organisations and allow them to advertise - as i see no reason why they should not (although i do hate religious advertising!!!), most organisations probably would not.

Date18:52:32, November 12, 2005 CET
From Federation Under Crazy Killers -- United
ToDebating the Corporate Equality
Messagebecause real companies do not promote hatred of others.

Date22:17:17, November 12, 2005 CET
FromConservative Party of Telamon
ToDebating the Corporate Equality
MessageThat is just wrong....promoting a religion?!

Look i'm all for freedom of religion, but i don't want to hear someone saying how his religion is the best...let them advertise the way they did it back then....going to the masses themselves, and telling them personally how their religion is not right.

Regardless of which i am fully opposed to this disgusting idea.

Date14:15:17, November 13, 2005 CET
FromUnited Liberal Alliance
ToDebating the Corporate Equality
MessageYes, its unfortunate i think that we may be operating in different world views here - i assume that in north america there is much overt religious advertising - something which i suppose i would dislike. Over here the most religious advertising i can think of was a campaign by the Church of England to try to get more people to go to church by pointing out what a central role the church played in the life of a community (i don't think that G-d was really mentioned at all!!) - that i think is ok

Date14:15:44, November 13, 2005 CET
FromUnited Liberal Alliance
ToDebating the Corporate Equality
MessageBut as i said i'm not really bothered which way we go on this

Date00:12:06, November 15, 2005 CET
FromAnti-Ownership Federation Party
ToDebating the Corporate Equality
Messagei don't think people should be influenced in what faith to choose

Date16:42:27, November 15, 2005 CET
FromRationalist Party
ToDebating the Corporate Equality
MessageI agree, but if we must tax religious organizations, which apparently is true, then why do we deny them of the rights of every other individual and organization in the country. That is; to buy air time (or some other medium) and express their views.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 100

no
    

Total Seats: 100

abstain
 

Total Seats: 55


Random fact: It is not allowed to call more than 5 elections in 5 game years in a nation. The default sanction for a player persisting in the early election tactic will be a seat reset.

Random quote: "Communism is like prohibition, it's a good idea but it won't work." - Will Rogers

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 69