Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5460
Next month in: 01:18:23
Server time: 14:41:36, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): MyungLuth | SE33 | Spiguer | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Imperial Court of Law Act of 3013

Details

Submitted by[?]: Constitutionalist Imperial League (IA)

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 3015

Description[?]:

Henceforth, as per the wishes of the Diet and the people of Luthori,

1) The Supreme Court of Law of the Holy Luthori Empire shall be known as the Imperial Court of Law.

2) The Imperial Court of Law shall have the final authority on the interpretation of the Imperial Constitution and shall carry out all other duties presently carried out by the Imperial Supreme Court.

3) There shall be nine justices on the Imperial Court of Law.

4) The Imperial Diet shall elect, by simple majority three of these justices.

5) The Privy Council shall elect, by simple majority three of these justices.

6) The Sovereign of Luthori shall appoint three of these justices.

7) All justices on the Imperial Court of Luthori must imperatively be either nobles or clergymen.

8) If a majority of the Diet believes a commoner should be appointed to the Court, it may request that this commoner be ennobled by the Sovereign who is then free to accept or deny such a request.

9) Said Sovereign must necessarily be the Head of the House of Orange-Villayn.

10) This act is an amendment to the 3rd Imperial Constitution of Luthori and requires the support of 2/3 of the Diet to pass.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:00:43, October 12, 2010 CET
FromConstitutionalist Imperial League (IA)
ToDebating the Imperial Court of Law Act of 3013
MessageMr Speaker,

We ask for comments from members of the Diet.

I yield.

Date18:30:01, October 13, 2010 CET
FromConstitutionalist Imperial League (IA)
ToDebating the Imperial Court of Law Act of 3013
MessageOOC: If there are no comments for another 24 hours, I'll send this to vote.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 140

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
       

    Total Seats: 61


    Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation.

    Random quote: "The superior man, when resting in safety, does not forget that danger may come. When in a state of security he does not forget the possibility of ruin. When all is orderly, he does not forget that disorder may come. Thus his person is not endangered, and his States and all their clans are preserved." - Confucius

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 38