We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: religous schools
Details
Submitted by[?]: Seosavists Republican party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2142
Description[?]:
because we don't want this:http://www.blackenterprise.com/yb/ybopen.asp?section=ybng&story_id=84167200&ID=blackenterprise to happen here we're proposing to regulate religious schools. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The governments stance on religious schools.
Old value:: Any religion may set up a school, with no regulations.
Current: Any religion may set up a school, but they are strictly regulated.
Proposed: Any religion may set up a school, but they are strictly regulated.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 02:16:41, November 13, 2005 CET | From | Luthori Green Party | To | Debating the religous schools |
Message | Yes. |
Date | 03:02:39, November 13, 2005 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the religous schools |
Message | Sounds like Communism to me. |
Date | 03:27:36, November 13, 2005 CET | From | Social Calvinist Unionist Party | To | Debating the religous schools |
Message | Sure. They can teach religion; the government is just there so that the schools don't start preaching "And the LOOORD said we must blow up the INFIDELS with the HOLY BOMBS OF JESUS!" and the like. |
Date | 23:33:46, November 13, 2005 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the religous schools |
Message | Open competition is the only "regulation" schools need. |
Date | 00:31:03, November 14, 2005 CET | From | United Conservative Party | To | Debating the religous schools |
Message | LEC needs to be strictly regulated. NO! |
Date | 02:40:28, November 14, 2005 CET | From | Luthori Green Party | To | Debating the religous schools |
Message | Does the UCP know that I was not the proposer of any of these bills? |
Date | 02:53:35, November 14, 2005 CET | From | Social Calvinist Unionist Party | To | Debating the religous schools |
Message | DUP; if we don't regulate these schools, the chances of a Timothy McVeigh type character coming along, with his "Kill all the Jews and N*ggers!" stuff, with his Anarchists Cookbook in his hand and sitting in his bomb truck, are very high. |
Date | 12:43:10, November 14, 2005 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the religous schools |
Message | Then we only allow recognised religions, not cults, to run schools BUT KEEP THE GOVERNMENT OUT! |
Date | 18:43:36, November 14, 2005 CET | From | Seosavists Republican party | To | Debating the religous schools |
Message | that's not keeping out the government because the government is the one saying what's recognised. |
Date | 20:06:53, November 14, 2005 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the religous schools |
Message | At least it would not be involved in running the schools. |
Date | 08:52:36, November 15, 2005 CET | From | United Conservative Party | To | Debating the religous schools |
Message | What's this word N*ggers? Is that Naggers, Neggers, Niggers, Noggers or Nuggers? Though, on reflection, it could be Neiggers, Nouggers, Nooggers, Naeggers, ... :-/ |
Date | 09:31:25, November 15, 2005 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the religous schools |
Message | Change this to recognised religions, unregulated, and it will pass. |
Date | 00:12:15, November 18, 2005 CET | From | United Conservative Party | To | Debating the religous schools |
Message | Unbelievable! You would allow the enemies of the Crusaders to open schools? The purveyors of murder, terror and hate? No. |
Date | 14:03:26, November 18, 2005 CET | From | Luthori Green Party | To | Debating the religous schools |
Message | IRL the crusaders were barbarians, purveyors of murder, terror and hate. |
Date | 21:46:58, November 18, 2005 CET | From | Social Calvinist Unionist Party | To | Debating the religous schools |
Message | Truly. The massacre at Acre was such an act of Barbarism. As was sacking Constantinople. I mean, why did you sack a fellow christian city? Why? And why did you massacre all the inhabitants of Jerusalem, be they Jews, Muslims, or even fellow Christians? |
Date | 03:17:23, November 19, 2005 CET | From | Luthori Green Party | To | Debating the religous schools |
Message | Actually, the crusaders killed more Christians than Jews, and more Jews than Muslims. After all, they were defending the holy land. I can't remember the name of the city, but at this city the crusaders slaughtered, cooked and ate the inhabitants, most were Christians. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 362 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 299 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 89 |
Random fact: Each user account may only be used by the player who set it up. Handing over an account to another player is not allowed. |
Random quote: "We must face the fact that the preservation of individual freedom is incompatible with a full satisfaction of our views of distributive justice." - Friedrich August von Hayek |