We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Furtherment of Technology Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Dolgaria Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2141
Description[?]:
| It has come to the CPD's attention that Dolgaria needs to legalize the development of cloning technology. However, as this area of science is dangerous and contraversial, the Government will regulate the development of such technologies. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy towards the cloning of human beings.
Old value:: The cloning of human beings is illegal.
Current: The cloning of human beings is illegal.
Proposed: Research in cloning technologies is legal, but regulated.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:18:55, November 13, 2005 CET | From | Socio-Democratic Union | To | Debating the Furtherment of Technology Act |
| Message | The SDU is ready to support such a legislation if strict rules are enforced to monitor reasearch activities. |
| Date | 01:37:50, November 13, 2005 CET | From | Liberty and Prosperity Party | To | Debating the Furtherment of Technology Act |
| Message | The LPP would be happier without any regulations at all on cloning. |
| Date | 12:39:44, November 13, 2005 CET | From | Dolgarian Imperial Revivalists | To | Debating the Furtherment of Technology Act |
| Message | We support this proposal. However, you have left it too late to go to voting before the election I am afraid.... |
| Date | 14:37:24, November 13, 2005 CET | From | United Dolgaria Party | To | Debating the Furtherment of Technology Act |
| Message | Fine, I'll post it on Monday after the election. I still want to here our opposition's opinion (CU and DNUP). |
| Date | 01:58:12, November 14, 2005 CET | From | Movement for White Supremacy | To | Debating the Furtherment of Technology Act |
| Message | Ditto, I believe that the Conservative bloc is all in support of this bill, but would be much happier if there were no regulations at all... |
| Date | 09:00:14, November 14, 2005 CET | From | Movement for White Supremacy | To | Debating the Furtherment of Technology Act |
| Message | Actually, CU doesnt really oppose any of our conservative bills CPD, he only opposes our free market legislation. Look at the voting patterns. |
| Date | 21:31:02, November 14, 2005 CET | From | Alianse Progresivitāte | To | Debating the Furtherment of Technology Act |
| Message | Ick... gonna have to vote no here on moral grounds. |
| Date | 06:34:32, November 15, 2005 CET | From | Movement for White Supremacy | To | Debating the Furtherment of Technology Act |
| Message | Can someone propose some more liberal legislation regarding this topic? |
| Date | 18:42:38, November 15, 2005 CET | From | Dolgarian Imperial Revivalists | To | Debating the Furtherment of Technology Act |
| Message | And I'm going to have to do a u-turn, for well oppositional reasons of course ;-) |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 333 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 248 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 169 |
| Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
| Random quote: "If we cannot, by reason, by influence, by example, by strenuous effort, and by personal sacrifice, mend the bad places of civilization, we certainly cannot do it by force." - Auberon Herbert |