Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5472
Next month in: 03:26:51
Server time: 16:33:08, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): hyraemous | itsjustgav | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of April 3018

Details

Submitted by[?]: Union Socialism Alliance

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 3019

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:07:09, October 21, 2010 CET
From Union Socialism Alliance
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 3018
MessageThe exact same Shades of Red government, with the CFP filling in for SLD, and the SP getting one spot at the cost of USA.

Date21:53:53, October 21, 2010 CET
From Anarcho-Primitivist Concern
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 3018
MessageI'd be happy with this.

Date23:50:50, October 21, 2010 CET
From Syndicalist Party (LL)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 3018
MessageWe doubt that the two parties with the less similar voting records can easily get along in the same cabinet. We totally respect the FFP, but Ikradon doesn't need another unstable cabinet. So we will be more than happy to concede our place to another party.

Date02:16:20, October 22, 2010 CET
From Union Socialism Alliance
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 3018
MessageAt this point in time, there isn't any other alternatives. it's either this, or new elections.

Date02:53:12, October 22, 2010 CET
From Dark Templar (LL)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 3018
MessageI see the USA has made its choice, we are disappointed as this could have been a great step for Ikradons left.

but we are mostly disappointed with our LL comrades who have chosen a seat in power over the will of the people.

Date02:54:56, October 22, 2010 CET
From SCI Libertarian-Socialist Syndicate (LL)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 3018
MessageOh, this is fun.... :)

That we could be so fractured that a cabinet is not even possible. :P

Date07:33:22, October 22, 2010 CET
From Lyika ati Isọdọtun
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 3018
MessageThis seems workable.

Date21:05:42, October 22, 2010 CET
From Art & Labour
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 3018
MessageWhilst we said we wouldn't be participating in cabinet, we never said anything about not supporting a cabinet we find least unfavourable (I.e. Not including SCI/DT). See, SCI, we can do that too.

Date22:21:40, October 22, 2010 CET
From SCI Libertarian-Socialist Syndicate (LL)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 3018
Message@SLD: Do you see me caring? I disagree with all cabinets at present, so vote away.... :)

Date13:22:15, October 23, 2010 CET
From Syndicalist Party (LL)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 3018
MessageWe are sorry. Maybe we weren't clear enough before. We are not supporting this cabinet.

Date13:54:59, October 23, 2010 CET
From SCI Libertarian-Socialist Syndicate (LL)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 3018
MessageIt's ok, it already passed.

Date14:32:13, October 23, 2010 CET
From Lyika ati Isọdọtun
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 3018
MessageActually, it did not. Since the Syndicalist Party is included in this cabinet, its support was necessary in order to pass it.

Date23:33:00, October 23, 2010 CET
From SCI Libertarian-Socialist Syndicate (LL)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 3018
MessageReally, I did not realize that was also a criteria. I figured any majority would pass it. Hmmm.... Never seen that before. :)

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 427

no
   

Total Seats: 323

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: It is possible for a player to transfer ownership of a character or a royal house to another player. This should be done in a public way, such as on the Character Transfers thread, so that if a dispute arises in the future, Moderation can be pointed towards evidence of the transfer.

    Random quote: "I think one should not go fast, because if you make mistakes you don't realize what you've done." - Manuela Carmena

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 84