Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5474
Next month in: 02:03:38
Server time: 09:56:21, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): burgerboys | SocDemDundorfian | Xalvas | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Police and Justice Reform Bill of 3028

Details

Submitted by[?]: People's Party - Republican Democrats

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 3028

Description[?]:

.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:34:54, November 10, 2010 CET
FromNemangha Humananghô
ToDebating the Police and Justice Reform Bill of 3028
MessageOur position on this bill can be summed up as follows:

Agree with Article 1
Disagree with Article 2 on the ground that it is impossible to determine what situations may arise that are beyond the capabilities of basic law enforcement responce.
Agree with Article 3.
Disagree with Article 4 based on the "harm one, save many" principle. We understand that this may not happen often, but it is unwise to prevent the government from acting on it if it ever does.

Date21:33:30, November 10, 2010 CET
FromPeople's Party - Republican Democrats
ToDebating the Police and Justice Reform Bill of 3028
MessageOOC: It might be helpful to to refer to the proposals by their numbers, as their order isn't always the same every time each one of us looks.
As it looks to me now, the FRFSP agrees with the separation of police and military,
- disagrees with probiting torture on the ground "that it is impossible to determine what situations may arise that are beyond the capabilities of basic law enforcement responce"
- agrees with having national and local police departments
- disagrees with the change in extradition laws "based on the "harm one, save many" principle"

It doesn't make sense somehow, does it?
I can imagine which articles are meant, though.

Date21:34:25, November 10, 2010 CET
FromPeople's Party - Republican Democrats
ToDebating the Police and Justice Reform Bill of 3028
MessageOOC: I ceratinly meant NOT to refer to the proposals by their numbers

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 108

no
  

Total Seats: 91

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar).

    Random quote: "The radical of one century is the conservative of the next. The radical invents the views. When he has worn them out the conservative adopts them." - Mark Twain

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 64