We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Populist Proposition CLXXX
Details
Submitted by[?]: Popular Stability
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 3032
Description[?]:
Instruction in religion should be the domain of parents, at home if they insist on indoctrinating their children in their particular faith. It should be not be the business of the state education system to do other than educate, or to condone indoctrination. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The governments stance on religious schools.
Old value:: Religious schools are allowed, but are strictly regulated. Only recognised religions may set up religious schools.
Current: Religious schools are allowed, but are strictly regulated. Only recognised religions may set up religious schools.
Proposed: Religious schools are not allowed.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 23:29:29, November 15, 2010 CET | From | Social Liberal Republicans (PET) | To | Debating the Populist Proposition CLXXX |
Message | The business of the state should be to extend freedom and choice to parents, not restrict it. |
Date | 02:29:43, November 18, 2010 CET | From | Social Liberal Republicans (PET) | To | Debating the Populist Proposition CLXXX |
Message | The SLR Party would like to ask the PMP when and why they changed their religious schools policy, since in 3022 they supported the formation of religious schools. Now they seem to oppose them. WHY? |
Date | 03:39:29, November 18, 2010 CET | From | ƒortenohƒiv (ACN) | To | Debating the Populist Proposition CLXXX |
Message | OOC: It not uncommon for parties to change their platforms. For instance, in the United States, the Republican party was the progressive party that supported universal rights until the Panic of 1873 rolled around, which turned the nation on them. With this, they changed their stance on universal voting rights from supporting to opposing. It happens. |
Date | 13:16:35, November 18, 2010 CET | From | Social Liberal Republicans (PET) | To | Debating the Populist Proposition CLXXX |
Message | I do not mind any party changing their possition, but the question remains...why? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 219 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 51 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Particracy has been running since 2005. Dorvik was Particracy's first nation, the Dorvik Social Democrats the first party and the International Greens the first Party Organisation. |
Random quote: "And what is Aleppo?" - Gary Johnson |