We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Adoption Reform
Details
Submitted by[?]: Aldegar National Monarchic Front
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 3039
Description[?]:
| To protect children only couples may do adoption. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning who can proceed with adoption; in case adoption is legal.
Old value:: Everyone may adopt children.
Current: Everyone may adopt children.
Proposed: Only couples may adopt children.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:09:48, November 30, 2010 CET | From | Aldegar National Monarchic Front | To | Debating the Adoption Reform |
| Message | To protect the right of children to have both mother and father, members of my party promote this reform and ask other party to vote yes. |
| Date | 21:25:35, November 30, 2010 CET | From | People's Party - Republican Democrats | To | Debating the Adoption Reform |
| Message | We in the People's Party wonder how this bill is supposed to ensure that children have both mother and father? As we see it, this bill also provides for mother and mother or father and father, which would be fine with us, but we believe that single people can also be good parents. |
| Date | 22:48:43, November 30, 2010 CET | From | Nemangha Humananghô | To | Debating the Adoption Reform |
| Message | It takes a couple, heterosexual or otherwise, to raise a family. |
| Date | 00:17:47, December 01, 2010 CET | From | People's Party - Republican Democrats | To | Debating the Adoption Reform |
| Message | Does the GAMC propose that children are taken away from single parents where one partner has died prematurely? Following the logic of their it-takes-a-couple-to-raise-a-family ideology to the end, it would only be consistent if they did. |
| Date | 00:45:10, December 01, 2010 CET | From | rEvolution | To | Debating the Adoption Reform |
| Message | The crucial issue is not whether you have two parents of both sexes. It's the fact that boys learn better from men, and girls from women. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 36 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 103 | ||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 60 |
| Random fact: Check out the forum regularly for game news. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
| Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |