We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Womens Rights Act of 3038
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hutorian Conservative Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 3039
Description[?]:
Bill to provide women with some rights to match those of men as regarding the workplace. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Women in the military.
Old value:: Women have no place in the military.
Current: Women serve alongside men.
Proposed: Women serve alongside men.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Women's working rights.
Old value:: Women are not allowed to work. The state requires them to stay at home.
Current: Women are entitled the same working rights as men.
Proposed: Women are entitled the same working rights as men.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:47:42, November 30, 2010 CET | From | Republican Party | To | Debating the Womens Rights Act of 3038 |
Message | Mr. Speaker, We do not support Article 1 but do endorse Article 2, which leaves our party in a tricky situation. As we have 0 seats in Parliament we will vote against this bill simply because it will have no affect on the bill passing. I yield. |
Date | 21:52:02, November 30, 2010 CET | From | Hutorian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Womens Rights Act of 3038 |
Message | Rt Hon Karl Harrod, Prime Minister, Mr Speaker, we are perplexed by the Conservative Partys policy regarding womens rights. The NSC is now committed to socialism and we believe that all citizen in Hutori - regardless of race, gender etc - should recieve the same opportunities in life. Are the Conservatives simply against womens rights in general because, Mr Speaker, their vote more than suggests that. |
Date | 23:05:09, November 30, 2010 CET | From | Republican Party | To | Debating the Womens Rights Act of 3038 |
Message | George Oldfield, Leader of the Conservative Party, Mr. Speaker, As a conservative party, we too support equal rights for all. May I remind the Hutori National-Socialists that we vote against this bill simply because we hold no seats in Parliament. Mr. Speaker, we do not support neither women having no place in the military nor women serving alongside men. The former is completely unfair and the latter would cause many problems. We, the Conservatives, value the military and want a professional armed forces without sex scandals and unprofessionalism damaging its reputation. We would support women serving in the armed forces in non-battle positions, or, serving in segregated units. As stated earlier, we completely support Article 2. |
Date | 00:34:51, December 01, 2010 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the Womens Rights Act of 3038 |
Message | Mr Speaker, We would like to take this oppurtunity to greet our anicent opponents and allies in the NSC. Our first move is to support this act. We believe in progressive, Liberal but socially minded politics, and this applies very well. Sinead McDade, Leader of the Labour Party. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 391 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 0 | |||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: For more information on Particracy's former colonial nations, check out http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6640 |
Random quote: "The whole uncivilized bunch on the opposite benches can get stuffed." - Craig Warwick, former Dranian politician |