We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Social Incentive and Titles
Details
Submitted by[?]: Meritocratic Alliance
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 3041
Description[?]:
| Reintroducing the Unionist bill of 3035: Written by: Peter, Lord Astor, CUP Spokesman for Social Incentive and Democracy Proposed by: Mohammad bin Nabil al-Said, Shadow Justice Secretary Reintroduced by Alfred Lord Beliarius, Senator and Party Exarch, Whig Article 1: a) This House believes a Socially Incentivising title to be a title that is granted on behalf of the State to an individual for significant contribution to Solentian life, culture, history, economy or society. b) This House recognisises titles such as "Lord, Lady, Baron, Duke" and other similarly styled ttiles to be included in this definition. Article 2: a) This House confirms it's recognition of Socially Incentivising titles. b) This House confirms it's recognition of the Supreme President's ability to grant such titles as defined in Article 1. c) This House confirms it's recongition of Socially Incentivising titles used in the past. Article 3: a) This Act will pass with more votes in the affirmative than in the negative. b) This Act may be repealed with more votes in the affirmative than in the negative in a Bill specifically designed to remove it. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 08:07:57, December 06, 2010 CET | From |  Meritocratic Alliance | To | Debating the Social Incentive and Titles |
| Message | Majority of votes cast. Bill shall carry. |
| Date | 12:16:19, December 06, 2010 CET | From | Coalition for National Unity [CNU] | To | Debating the Social Incentive and Titles |
| Message | *Unionist supporters and campaigners cheer in the streets outside of Capitol Hill.* "Victory!" |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 229 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 196 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "Patriotism is in political life what faith is in religion." - John Dalberg-Acton |