We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Court Jurisdiction Reform of 3044
Details
Submitted by[?]: Aldegar National Monarchic Front
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 3046
Description[?]:
| With this reform we want to change competencies of regional and national courts. Regional courts have local juridiction, while national courts should express themself over national problem. Obviously the right to appeal remains. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's position towards the administration of law.
Old value:: There are regional courts, but decisions of regional courts may be appealed to national courts (if the right to appeal exists).
Current: There are regional courts that have jurisdiction over questions of regional law and national courts that have jurisdiction over questions of national law.
Proposed: There are regional courts that have jurisdiction over questions of regional law and national courts that have jurisdiction over questions of national law.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:19:58, December 13, 2010 CET | From | Aldegar National Monarchic Front | To | Debating the Court Jurisdiction Reform of 3044 |
| Message | With this reform we want to change competencies of regional and national courts. Regional courts have local juridiction, while national courts should express themself over national problem. Obviously the right to appeal remains. |
| Date | 15:54:40, December 13, 2010 CET | From | Aldegar Post-Left | To | Debating the Court Jurisdiction Reform of 3044 |
| Message | No, as this leaves us vulnerable to unjust national court decisions that threaten the sovereignty of individual satrapies. National courts should remain strictly appellate courts. |
| Date | 16:29:54, December 13, 2010 CET | From | Aldegar National Monarchic Front | To | Debating the Court Jurisdiction Reform of 3044 |
| Message | With the actual system all types of cases - even those of national interest - are discussed and judged in local courts. National courts respond only in case of appeals and they may overturn the results (notwhistanding the sovereignty of individual satrapies). What we have proposed instead here is a radical change in which local courts has the right to judge every cause with exemption of those present national relevance by law. We think the sovereignty of individual Satrapies remains intact even with this change. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 105 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 53 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 41 |
| Random fact: It is the collective responsibility of the players in a nation to ensure all currently binding RP laws are clearly outlined in an OOC reference bill in the "Bills under debate" section of the nation page. Confusion should not be created by displaying only some of the current RP laws or displaying RP laws which are no longer current. |
| Random quote: "The communist revolution is the most radical rupture with traditional property relations; no wonder that its development involves the most radical rupture with traditional ideas." - Karl Marx |