Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5461
Next month in: 00:46:55
Server time: 07:13:04, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: SDWF Police Reform Bill, 3050

Details

Submitted by[?]: Social Democratic Workers' Federation

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 3051

Description[?]:

"We cannot lend any credibility to the use of force by the state except in extreme circumstances. We cannot lend our endorsement to a society which is dominated by violence and controlled by fear of violence."

-Arnold Deniau

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:20:09, December 26, 2010 CET
From Coalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the SDWF Police Reform Bill, 3050
Message"Fully endorsed."

Lord Protector Callermansted, Unionist Chancellor.

Date05:53:00, December 27, 2010 CET
From Meritocratic Alliance
ToDebating the SDWF Police Reform Bill, 3050
MessageAre they supposed to grin violent criminals into obedience?

Date15:19:02, December 27, 2010 CET
From Social Democratic Workers' Federation
ToDebating the SDWF Police Reform Bill, 3050
Message"If you read the proposal, you would see that the legislation would make provision for a specially trained firearms unit."

Date18:36:16, December 27, 2010 CET
From Meritocratic Alliance
ToDebating the SDWF Police Reform Bill, 3050
MessageYou equip based on the unknown, not relying on being able to call up a specialty trained squad when the need arises. It's foolhardy.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 49

no
     

Total Seats: 376

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

Random quote: "The theory of Communism may be summed up in the single sentence: abolition of private property." - Karl Marx

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 55