Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5471
Next month in: 01:56:52
Server time: 02:03:07, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (6): ameerali | Arusu-Weareback | hexaus18 | hyraemous | jebjab | starfruit | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ratification of the United Countries

Details

Submitted by[?]: Freedom Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2142

Description[?]:

This bill asks for the ratification of the <a href="viewtreaty.php?treatyid=130">United Countries</a>. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:16:45, November 15, 2005 CET
From Freedom Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the United Countries
MessageTHE MEMBER-STATES OF THE UNITED COUNTRIES,

to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which brings untold sorrow to mankind, and

to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small, and

to establish conditions under which justice and respect for the obligations arising from treaties and other sources of international law can be maintained, and

to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,

AND FOR THESE ENDS

to practice tolerance and live together in peace with one another as good neighbours, and

to unite our strength to maintain international peace and security, and

to ensure, by the acceptance of principles and the institution of methods, that armed force shall not be used, save in the common interest, and

to employ international machinery for the promotion of the economic and social advancement of all peoples,

RESOLVE TO COMBINE OUR EFFORTS TO ACCOMPLISH THESE AIMS. AS SUCH,

The United Countries shall be an international organization founded upon the sovereignty of its individual member-states. It shall comprise three main divisions, under which will serve various lesser institutions and organizations. It shall comprise the Secretariat, which acts as a ceremonial leader and a guide for the resolution of issues; a General Assembly, which shall comprise the member-states and will participate in the drafting and debating of resolutions; the Security Council, which shall resolve international disputes and serve to prevent the spread of conflict in Terra.

Date14:17:58, November 15, 2005 CET
From Freedom Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the United Countries
MessageIt does not lay out anything on who will make up the security council, the secreteriat and how drafting resolutions and passing them will not infringe upon the sovereignty of member states. It needed work before being sent for ratification

Date15:36:29, November 15, 2005 CET
FromRadical Freedom Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the United Countries
MessageI still think we should endorse this and perhaps push for reform from within. The resolutions do not infringe because they are non-binding, obviously.

Date17:16:45, November 15, 2005 CET
From RSDP - Democratic Front
ToDebating the Ratification of the United Countries
MessageIndeed, we should work in the General Assembly to establish clear rules of functioning and procedure. I request that this be put to vote.

Date18:41:06, November 15, 2005 CET
FromLiberal Imperialist Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the United Countries
MessageGood god, no.

Date19:57:15, November 15, 2005 CET
FromKommunistische Arbeitspartei
ToDebating the Ratification of the United Countries
Message"It does not lay out anything on who will make up the security council, the secreteriat and how drafting resolutions and passing them will not infringe upon the sovereignty of member states. It needed work before being sent for ratification"

I agree that my terms were vague, but this was intentional. I want members to create the specific regulations once the UC is formed.

Date22:04:56, November 15, 2005 CET
From Freedom Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the United Countries
MessageYou can request what you want but i feel we should debate this more before sending it to vote

Date22:04:57, November 15, 2005 CET
From RSDP - Democratic Front
ToDebating the Ratification of the United Countries
Message"Good god, no."

My, what a constructive attitude. :rolleyes:

Date18:24:52, November 16, 2005 CET
From RSDP - Democratic Front
ToDebating the Ratification of the United Countries
MessageSince no one has responded for a day, I think it is best to move to vote.

Date23:25:01, November 16, 2005 CET
From Freedom Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the United Countries
MessageMove to a vote that will end up being stopped by the election? How smart you are

Date21:11:54, November 17, 2005 CET
From RSDP - Democratic Front
ToDebating the Ratification of the United Countries
MessageIf the "honourable" Foreign Minister continues to refuse to open voting, I shall have to request the Federal President to do so.

Date22:33:58, November 17, 2005 CET
From Freedom Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the United Countries
Message"If the idiot from the RSDP doesnt shut up and stop whining i might have to slap him"

Unattributed quote to a FP MP

Date22:51:45, November 17, 2005 CET
From Freedom Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the United Countries
MessageI submit this

http://82.238.75.178:8085/particracy/wiki/index.php/Grossdundorf

Date19:40:34, November 18, 2005 CET
From RSDP - Democratic Front
ToDebating the Ratification of the United Countries
MessageAnd how does that affect the United Countries?

Date21:50:45, November 18, 2005 CET
FromKommunistische Arbeitspartei
ToDebating the Ratification of the United Countries
MessageIt doesn't. It was a little cultural note I wrote up about Dundorf which, if you'll look, has no political power in the modern day.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
      

Total Seats: 399

no
   

Total Seats: 200

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Make sure to check out Particracy's wiki. http://particracy.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page

    Random quote: "To punish the oppressors of humanity is clemency; to forgive them is barbarity." - Maximilien Robespierre

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 71