We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Administrative Reform Act (2)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Bürgerlichen Soziale Union
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 3054
Description[?]:
| This is a revised Administrative Act. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The official title of the legislative assembly.
Old value:: People's Assembly
Current: Staatsrat (State Council)
Proposed: Parliament of Dorvik
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The length of a legislative and executive term, in months. Should be between 24 and 72.
Old value:: 42
Current: 48
Proposed: 24
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The total number of seats in the legislative assembly. Should be between 75 and 750.
Old value:: 500
Current: 700
Proposed: 250
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:22:16, December 31, 2010 CET | From | Hosian-Konservative Allianz | To | Debating the Administrative Reform Act (2) |
| Message | Mr.Speaker, I'd like to commend the Education Party and the CPU for their efforts standing against this bill. NSPD, while I understand your views, we have a long established history and Dorvik and changing that history would be rather insensitive. |
| Date | 21:20:54, December 31, 2010 CET | From | Bürgerlichen Soziale Union | To | Debating the Administrative Reform Act (2) |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, I know know the values and history of Dorvik, I know that the length of legislative term has just been changed recently, I know that in the past our parliament was as small as 75, and that our country was not the "People's Republic of Dorvik" nor did we have a "People's Assembly". My efforts are to De-communize this nation, obviously we have not one party with possible communist views. |
| Date | 22:56:48, December 31, 2010 CET | From | Hosian-Konservative Allianz | To | Debating the Administrative Reform Act (2) |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, We did at one point before the original Communist Party of Dorvik was dissolved due to internal problems nearly 150 years ago. Challenging the national name of the country? That seems to be the most unpatriotic thing anyone can do. Questioning the country itself? That is pure political heresy. |
| Date | 05:55:34, January 01, 2011 CET | From | Bürgerlichen Soziale Union | To | Debating the Administrative Reform Act (2) |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, I as well as my party will always 'challenge' as you say, the name of this country. It is not unpatriotic, it is a simple effort to; like we said before, de-communize this nation once and for all. No one is questioning the nation itself. I am question the democratic spirit in it. Obviously defending of the name of this country is a dogma for you and your party. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 185 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 315 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Real-life places should not be referenced in Particracy. |
| Random quote: "How we can possibly be giving £1bn a month, when we're in this sort of debt, to Bongo Bongo Land is completely beyond me." - Godfrey Bloom |