We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Logging Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Bürgerlichen Soziale Union
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 3054
Description[?]:
We are reintroducing this bill , again. What is the point of a industry, which is heavily regulated; and does incrediable damage to our land? What is the point of having harsh pollution and recycling laws if we cannot prevent our own forests from being cleared? A license does not change anything. You give 10 large companies a license, and they cut down half of the forest land, will that make us happy? We should heavily regulate the restrictions to forest land. We must protect nature, and protect the clean, forests which our ancestors roamed and lived in, possibly a source of their development. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning forest protection.
Old value:: Forests are protected. Logging is allowed by licence only.
Current: Forests have strictly enforced protection. Felling is limited to fire breaks.
Proposed: Forests have strictly enforced protection. Felling is limited to fire breaks.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 09:06:05, December 31, 2010 CET | From | . | To | Debating the Logging Act |
Message | Mr. Speaker, We believe it is possible for Dorvik to maintain a thriving foresty industry whilst preserving the extent of our forests, providing the amount of trees than are allowed to be felled is limited. |
Date | 09:06:32, December 31, 2010 CET | From | . | To | Debating the Logging Act |
Message | than = that |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 336 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 164 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
Random quote: "We live in a world in which politics has replaced philosophy." - Martin L. Gross |