Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5471
Next month in: 00:48:09
Server time: 11:11:50, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): AethanKal | Aren | itsjustgav | Nileowen_Kir | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Budget proposal of June 3057

Details

Submitted by[?]: Democratic-Republican Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 3058

Description[?]:

The Union for Social Change propose to adjust the government's spending budget to better address the economic and social situation of the Holy Luthori Empire.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date05:05:31, January 08, 2011 CET
FromImperial Aristocratic League
ToDebating the Budget proposal of June 3057
MessageMr. Speaker,

The USC must be run by idiots or insane people. It is now the belief of the LPP that the USC seeks to destroy everything this nation stands for and was built on. the LPP will no longer tolerate the USC and hereby no longer recognizes the USC as a legitimate political party. The opinion of the USC will no longer be respected by the LPP until the USC shows at least some sense of what it means to be a luthorian. This bill makes it obvious that the USC does not respect the Luthorian military and would condemn our soldiers to death before supporting them. This is an act of treason in the eyes of the LPP and again WE WILL NOT STAND FOR IT.

I yield.
LPP members stand an applaud the chairmans speech.

Date07:38:28, January 08, 2011 CET
FromFreedom and Revolution Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of June 3057
MessageMr. Speaker,

The Luthorian Patriots Party must be run by paranoid fanatics or unimaginative fools. It is now the belief of the FRP that the LPP is incapable of understanding politics and rational discussion. One, it does not recognize the fact that the USC is completely aware that such a budget would not pass, but was simply proposed as a political grand-standing point to trump up its pacifism. Second, it is our belief that the LPP are actually fascists and common, uneducated buffoons, incapable of addressing points of view different from theirs, and thus incapable of rational discussion.

Of course, while supporting the USCs dedication to peace, we cannot attach our name to this proposal, as peace cannot be had until the warmakers drown in the blood of their sins.

I yield.

Date07:49:57, January 08, 2011 CET
FromDemocratic-Republican Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of June 3057
MessageSpeaker,

We do not respect the miltiary complex, the LPP is correct. However, who are the true patriots? Those who blindly follow an ignorant, out of touch ruler, or those of us who stand with the people that work the lands? Furthermore, if they chose to ignore our legitimacy, then perhaps their opposition to progress will be easier to overcome.

I yield.

Date16:47:39, January 08, 2011 CET
FromConstitutionalist Imperial League (IA)
ToDebating the Budget proposal of June 3057
MessageCIL members also stand and applaud as the LPP chairman finishes his speech.

Mr Speaker,

It is our firm belief that the most honourable chairman of the LPP is completely accurate in his judgement of the USC. As a result of this act and others, we will call for strict penalties and sanctions to be applied against the USC in the ongoing meeting of the IULAC.

I yield.

Date17:53:34, January 08, 2011 CET
FromDemocratic-Republican Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of June 3057
MessageSpeaker,

We thought this chamber had order! Evidently the speaker is biased, therefore we ask you: Are you ASKING for a (non-violent) revolution?

I yield.

The USC delegates, the largest contigent, broke out in applause and cheering.

Date20:41:56, January 08, 2011 CET
FromConstitutionalist Imperial League (IA)
ToDebating the Budget proposal of June 3057
MessageApplause is not prohibited as it is not a breach of courtesy, booing and especially threats are.

Mr Speaker,

Threatening revolution is equal to the crime of high treason, which will be added to the crime of petty treason when charges are brought against the USC. Furthermore, we will remind the USC that the punishment for high treason is a mandatory death sentence by hanging, drawing and quartering.

I yield.

Date05:04:49, January 09, 2011 CET
FromDemocratic-Republican Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of June 3057
MessageSpeaker,

You can kill people, but not justice.

I yield.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 79

no
    

Total Seats: 122

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar).

    Random quote: "Take our country back" - Conservative Republican campaign slogan for the 4690 Likatonian election

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 61