We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Banning of animal testing for cosmetic products
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Soviet Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2142
Description[?]:
Ban on testing cosmetic products on annimals |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The use of animals in cosmetics research.
Old value:: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is regulated.
Current: Animals may not be used for testing cosmetics products.
Proposed: Animals may not be used for testing cosmetics products.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 19:15:46, November 15, 2005 CET | From | United Soviet Party | To | Debating the Banning of animal testing for cosmetic products |
Message | This annimal testing is unnesecarry |
Date | 08:47:45, November 16, 2005 CET | From | National Fascisti | To | Debating the Banning of animal testing for cosmetic products |
Message | OOC: Although it is kind of nitpicking to comment on your spelling, I would advise you to at least spell your party name correctly, "Progresive Liberal Party". |
Date | 08:48:03, November 16, 2005 CET | From | National Fascisti | To | Debating the Banning of animal testing for cosmetic products |
Message | We do not support. |
Date | 09:00:52, November 16, 2005 CET | From | Totalitarian Party | To | Debating the Banning of animal testing for cosmetic products |
Message | The Totalitarian Party supports this bill. |
Date | 16:31:35, November 16, 2005 CET | From | Nationalist Party of Gaduridos | To | Debating the Banning of animal testing for cosmetic products |
Message | I'd rather test the effects of acid on my household pets, rather than my children. In fact, I do. |
Date | 17:01:25, November 16, 2005 CET | From | Anarcho-Capitalist Front | To | Debating the Banning of animal testing for cosmetic products |
Message | Animals have no protections from society, they are property and will be treated as such. |
Date | 19:06:13, November 16, 2005 CET | From | People's Progressive Party | To | Debating the Banning of animal testing for cosmetic products |
Message | If animals are property than that means you are property also as we are all animals. Thus, is the ACF indirectly saying it believes in slavery? |
Date | 09:18:31, November 17, 2005 CET | From | National Fascisti | To | Debating the Banning of animal testing for cosmetic products |
Message | That's such a trivial objection. Clearly there is a distinction between humans and 'animals'. |
Date | 18:53:31, November 17, 2005 CET | From | People's Progressive Party | To | Debating the Banning of animal testing for cosmetic products |
Message | Actually the distinction lies only in how humans view themselves. It is a scientific fact however that we and they are both animals. |
Date | 15:00:38, November 18, 2005 CET | From | National Fascisti | To | Debating the Banning of animal testing for cosmetic products |
Message | And that's the distinction that counts. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 174 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 267 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Real-life places should not be referenced in Particracy. |
Random quote: "Whenever the people are well informed, they can be trusted with their own government; that whenever things get so far wrong as to attract their notice, they may be relied on to set them to rights." - Thomas Jefferson |