We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Bill 2.64 A
Details
Submitted by[?]: Medusoid Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2143
Description[?]:
What people do is really no business of ours, nor is what people watch |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Protection of original works of technology and arts.
Old value:: Works of technology and art are protected by copyright.
Current: Works of techology and art have limited copy protection.
Proposed: Technology and art are part of the commons and are not protected by copyright.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change National policy regarding the desecration of the national flag.
Old value:: The national flag may not be desecrated or dishonoured.
Current: The national flag may not be desecrated or dishonoured.
Proposed: There are no regulations regarding the desecration or use of the national flag.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Internet regulations.
Old value:: The government allows anyone to use the internet but the police can run investigations concerning illegal activities conducted by using internet (child abuse, illegal filesharing, ...)
Current: The government allows anyone to use the internet but the police can run investigations concerning illegal activities conducted by using internet (child abuse, illegal filesharing, ...)
Proposed: The government has no position on who may use or what is published on the internet.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change International media content regulation.
Old value:: International media content undergoes the same regulation as domestic media content.
Current: International media content undergoes the same regulation as domestic media content.
Proposed: International media content is free from regulation
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change Right to privacy.
Old value:: Individuals have a right to privacy, but the courts can force individuals to give information on certain matters if needed. (also known as Habeas Data).
Current: Individuals have a right to privacy, but the courts can force individuals to give information on certain matters if needed. (also known as Habeas Data).
Proposed: Individuals have a right to privacy, to keep records and information for themselves.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 00:42:27, November 16, 2005 CET | From | Union of Progressive Ulama | To | Debating the Bill 2.64 A |
Message | Supported on all articles. |
Date | 03:45:00, November 16, 2005 CET | From | Nilhist Party | To | Debating the Bill 2.64 A |
Message | I like: The government's policy regarding the ownership of domesticated animals as pets. The age until which students, if education were to be compulsary, are required to be educated I dont lik the rest. thus - no support. |
Date | 16:39:22, November 16, 2005 CET | From | Medusoid Party | To | Debating the Bill 2.64 A |
Message | that being the case i shall split the bil |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 404 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 346 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: When elections in a country are held, all bills in the voting phase are reset to the debate phase. |
Random quote: As for rape, of course, that is a direct consequence of the capitalist system of oppression. Capitalism relies on fuelling division and resentment to sustain itself, and so it sets men against women, race against race and so on. Men rape women because they are being oppressed by capitalism, so they take it out on women. Under Communism, there will be no rape, because there will be a full and natural harmony and equality between the genders. ~ Friedrich Pfeiffer General Secretary of the Dorvish Communist Party |