We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: White Supremacy Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Knights of the Red Shirt League
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 3061
Description[?]:
Humans of western european descent are inherently superior to those of most other ethnic origins, and the laws of a white man's country should reflect this. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 15:04:27, January 14, 2011 CET |
From | Knights of the Red Shirt League | To | Debating the White Supremacy Act | Message | Even if you oppose racial segregation, if you care at all about the sovereignty of Darnussia you will vote yes on this. International treaties, regardless of their content, are nothing more than an attempt to strip our great nation of its independence. |
Date | 15:06:14, January 14, 2011 CET |
From | Communist Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the White Supremacy Act | Message | Shut up about the game for a second.
Stop referencing real-life places and organisations. It's against game rules. Ive already reported you over your name and your refusal to change it. |
Date | 15:13:06, January 14, 2011 CET |
From | Communist Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the White Supremacy Act | Message | Directly violating rule 4.1.1.3 of the Pax Cynica:
Terra is distinct from the real world and so real world party, ideology, business or personal names, excepting the cases in sections 3.1.2.1-3.1.2.4 cannot be lifted to be used IC; a statement containing these will be considered OOC. |
Date | 18:12:33, January 14, 2011 CET |
From | Knights of the Red Shirt League | To | Debating the White Supremacy Act | Message | So you base your policies on things like titles which hold absolutely no substantive value? That certainly makes you a party worth voting; a party that is more concerned about things without substance as opposed to substantive things that actual effect the lives Darnussians. |
Date | 18:20:07, January 14, 2011 CET |
From | Knights of the Red Shirt League | To | Debating the White Supremacy Act | Message | Errors Fixed:
So you base your policies on things like titles which hold absolutely no substantive value? That certainly makes you a party worth voting for; a party that is more concerned about things without substance as opposed to substantive things that actually effect the lives Darnussians.
|
Date | 21:26:56, January 14, 2011 CET |
From | Conservative Libertarian Party | To | Debating the White Supremacy Act | Message | The DRCA become worth voting for because of the fact that they will not lay down a single belief for a quick result. Stop being offensive, and your typing patterns seem close to the Liberal Party. |
Date | 22:06:21, January 14, 2011 CET |
From | Knights of the Red Shirt League | To | Debating the White Supremacy Act | Message | "The DRCA become worth voting for because of the fact that they will not lay down a single belief for a quick result. Stop being offensive, and your typing patterns seem close to the Liberal Party."
Actually, I'm pretty sure this is what the DRCA said "We will vote no as we cannot get passed the name of this bill.". I could be wrong though; just going by what I read in a comment about 4 posts up listed as from the DRCA. |
subscribe to this discussion -
unsubscribeVoting
Vote |
Seats |
yes | Total Seats: 0 |
no | Total Seats: 701 |
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: "Game mechanics comes first." For example, if a currently-enforced bill sets out one law, then a player cannot claim the government has set out a contradictory law. |
Random quote: "Public schools are government-established, politician- and bureaucrat-controlled, fully politicized, taxpayer-supported, authoritarian socialist institutions. In fact, the public-school system is one of the purest examples of socialism existing in America." - Thomas L. Johnson |