We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Children, Marriage, and Life Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Darnussian Reform Conservative Alliance
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 3061
Description[?]:
Preservation of these things are neccessary for a free state. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning who can proceed with adoption; in case adoption is legal.
Old value:: Everyone may adopt children.
Current: Only heterosexual couples may adopt children.
Proposed: Only heterosexual couples may adopt children.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy with respect to adultery.
Old value:: Adultery is illegal, but not prosecuted.
Current: Adultery is illegal, but not prosecuted.
Proposed: Adultery is a capital offence.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The right to euthanasia.
Old value:: Euthanasia is allowed with consent from the patient and the treating doctor.
Current: Euthanasia is illegal and considered murder.
Proposed: Euthanasia is illegal and considered murder.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 18:18:30, January 14, 2011 CET | From | Communist Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Children, Marriage, and Life Act |
Message | This is just unbelievably stupid and dictatorial |
Date | 18:21:10, January 14, 2011 CET | From | Darnussian Reform Conservative Alliance | To | Debating the Children, Marriage, and Life Act |
Message | says the communist |
Date | 20:50:28, January 14, 2011 CET | From | Communist Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Children, Marriage, and Life Act |
Message | We are more democratic that your politics as is shown by what you have just put before the house. |
Date | 01:51:29, January 15, 2011 CET | From | Darnussian Reform Conservative Alliance | To | Debating the Children, Marriage, and Life Act |
Message | murder = murder; parents = mom + dad; marriage => exclusivity. How is this undemocratic??? |
Date | 15:21:26, January 15, 2011 CET | From | Communist Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Children, Marriage, and Life Act |
Message | By placing those who commit adultery, something that is entirely their choice, in prison for life. By discriminating against homosexuals, something that is on a par with racism. By taking away people's right to die, something that they choose to do and that nobody else has a right to question. |
Date | 15:34:02, January 15, 2011 CET | From | Communist Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Children, Marriage, and Life Act |
Message | And since when does parents = mum + dad? Where does it say that? Where is the official text that means that is the case and textbook denotation? |
Date | 03:21:32, January 16, 2011 CET | From | Darnussian Reform Conservative Alliance | To | Debating the Children, Marriage, and Life Act |
Message | Marriage is a state contract, breaking those is illegal. Its not about the gays, its about giving kids proper families. By nature, gays cannot have kids, why should we make it so through adoption? Biologically, a parent organism creates the offpsring organism. gays cannot do this. thats as textbook as you are going to get. It is not the choice of the individual to die, just as it is not their choice to be born. It is the choice of God, or for athiests, the choice of nature. |
Date | 14:11:06, January 16, 2011 CET | From | Communist Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Children, Marriage, and Life Act |
Message | Do not bring God into this. And you still never actually answered my enquiries about people choosing to end their own life. I think you'll find it can very well be the choice of an individual to die, and the state to not have a right to intrude on it and order the individual what to do. You claim to be guided by God, yet your economic policies show you to be nothing more than a disgusting tyrant over the poor, and a tax haven over the rich, all the while claiming to support Christianity. The bible has many quotes that attack the rich and bless the poor: Matthew 19:16-24, Mark 10:17-25, Luke 18:18-25, Luke 1:49-53, Matthew 19:25-26, Matthew 21:12-14, Mark 11:15, John 2:14-16, Mark 12:28-31, Matthew 25:31-46, and even Leviticus 25:35-38. "Love thy neighbour as thyself" - something you are clearly not doing. |
Date | 23:06:36, January 16, 2011 CET | From | Darnussian Reform Conservative Alliance | To | Debating the Children, Marriage, and Life Act |
Message | I love the fallacies in which you spew. The bible does not say that govt should tax the rich more than the poor. It teaches against greed etc. As a person of greater than poverty wealth, i give to charities and help the poor in ways that the government never could. Keep in mind, tithings happen to be given at a flat rate of 10%. God loves the flat tax. God loves charity. God does not like the government that uses tax dollars to become overpowerful. I do not need the government to love my neighbour, I am better than that. Government force does not equal charity, it equals theft. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 93 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 473 | |||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 135 |
Random fact: "Game mechanics comes first." For example, if a currently-enforced bill sets out one law, then a player cannot claim the government has set out a contradictory law. |
Random quote: "If there's anything a public servant hates to do it's something for the public." - Kin Hubbard |