We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights
Details
Submitted by[?]: Progressive Democratic Alliance
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2141
Description[?]:
This bill asks for the ratification of the <a href="viewtreaty.php?treatyid=110">Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights</a>. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 01:11:41, November 16, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights |
Message | 2 reasons why I didn't put this through when I was Forgein Minister 1. There was a bill currently under vote that conflicted with Article 3 2. Article 2 I'll vote nay because of Article 2. |
Date | 19:12:12, November 16, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights |
Message | What a chuvinistic and sexist attitude from LBSC, however the SDP is not suprised at the sexism from LBSC and the male chuvinist attitude from LBSC, it quiet sad really. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 111 | |||||||
no |
Total Seats: 90 | |||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Moderation reserves the discretion to declare RP laws invalid if the players supporting them are doing so in an excessively confrontational way. |
Random quote: "An "acceptable" level of unemployment means that the government economist to whom it is acceptable still has a job." - Author Unknown |